Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: A randomized trial

Volume: 61, Issue: 4
Published: Apr 1, 2007
Abstract
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific publication. However, it is time consuming for reviewers and contributors, and must be balanced with editorial oversight for balance and bias. To test a more efficient method of reviewing manuscripts, we performed a randomized trial comparing traditional peer review for all manuscripts received by the Annals of Neurology with an early screening approach in which six editors rejected a manuscript without...
Paper Details
Title
Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: A randomized trial
Published Date
Apr 1, 2007
Volume
61
Issue
4
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.