Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices

Volume: 25, Pages: 4 - 22
Published: Sep 1, 2014
Abstract
Recently, a number of scholars (e.g., Leask, 2006, Liu, 2005) have raised concerns about the discourse of plagiarism, arguing that an emphasis on cultural difference has served to reinforce stereotypes of particular L2 groups and perpetuate deficit views of L2 learners. In an effort to address these concerns, the present study revisits Keck's own (2006) comparison of L1 and L2 summarization practices and investigates (1) why both L1 and L2...
Paper Details
Title
Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices
Published Date
Sep 1, 2014
Volume
25
Pages
4 - 22
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.