What motivates people to review articles? The case of the human‐computer interaction community

Recruiting qualified reviewers, though challenging, is crucial for ensuring a fair and robust scholarly peer review process. We conducted a survey of 307 reviewers of submissions to the I nternational C onference on H uman F actors in C omputing S ystems ( CHI 2011) to gain a better understanding of their motivations for reviewing. We found that encouraging high‐quality research, giving back to the research community, and finding out about new...