Referees, editors, and publication practices: Improving the reliability and usefulness of the peer review system
Abstract
The documented low levels of reliability of the peer review process present a serious challenge to editors who must often base their publication decisions on conflicting referee recommendations. The purpose of this article is to discuss this process and examine ways to produce a more reliable and useful peer review...
Paper Details
Title
Referees, editors, and publication practices: Improving the reliability and usefulness of the peer review system
Published Date
Mar 1, 1997
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
51 - 62
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History