Biodiversity data should be published, cited, and peer reviewed

Volume: 28, Issue: 8, Pages: 454 - 461
Published: Aug 1, 2013
Abstract
Concerns over data quality impede the use of public biodiversity databases and subsequent benefits to society. Data publication could follow the well-established publication process: with automated quality checks, peer review, and editorial decisions. This would improve data accuracy, reduce the need for users to 'clean' the data, and might increase data use. Authors and editors would get due credit for a peer-reviewed (data) publication through...
Paper Details
Title
Biodiversity data should be published, cited, and peer reviewed
Published Date
Aug 1, 2013
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
454 - 461
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.