Comparative effectiveness research priorities: Identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision making

Volume: 25, Issue: 03, Pages: 241 - 248
Published: Jul 1, 2009
Abstract
Background: In the debate on improving the quality and efficiency of the United States healthcare system, comparative effectiveness research is increasingly seen as a tool for reducing costs without compromising outcomes. Furthermore, the recent American Recovery and Reinvestment Act explicitly describes a prioritization function for establishing a comparative effectiveness research agenda. However, how such a function, in terms of methods and...
Paper Details
Title
Comparative effectiveness research priorities: Identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision making
Published Date
Jul 1, 2009
Volume
25
Issue
03
Pages
241 - 248
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.