A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology
Abstract
ObjectivesTo investigate whether training in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, or manuscript peer review effectively improves educational outcomes related to the quality of health research reporting.Study Design and SettingWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library for comparative studies of formalized, a priori–developed training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, or...
Paper Details
Title
A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology
Published Date
Mar 1, 2015
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
257 - 265
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History