Still no evidence for the encoding variability hypothesis: A reply to Jang, Mickes, and Wixted (2012) and Starns, Rotello, and Ratcliff (2012).

Volume: 39, Issue: 1, Pages: 304 - 312
Published: Jan 1, 2013
Abstract
Koen and Yonelinas (2010) contrasted the recollection and encoding variability accounts of the finding that old items are associated with more variable memory strength than new items. The study indicated that (a) increasing encoding variability did not lead to increased measures of old item variance, and (b) old item variance was directly related to the contribution of recollection. Jang, Mickes, and Wixted (2012) and Starns, Rotello, and...
Paper Details
Title
Still no evidence for the encoding variability hypothesis: A reply to Jang, Mickes, and Wixted (2012) and Starns, Rotello, and Ratcliff (2012).
Published Date
Jan 1, 2013
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
304 - 312
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.