Better LATE Than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009)

Volume: 48, Issue: 2, Pages: 399 - 423
Published: Jun 1, 2010
Abstract
Two recent papers, Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009), argue against what they see as an excessive and inappropriate use of experimental and quasi-experimental methods in empirical work in economics in the last decade. They specifically question the increased use of instrumental variables and natural experiments in labor economics and of randomized experiments in development economics. In these comments, I will make the case that this...
Paper Details
Title
Better LATE Than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009)
Published Date
Jun 1, 2010
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
399 - 423
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.