Reply to comments by W. Schneider concerning the paper by M. Miklavčič and C. Y. Wang “Completely passive natural convection” ZAMM 91(7), 601–606 (2011)

Volume: 91, Issue: 12, Pages: 1004 - 1004
Published: Nov 8, 2011
Abstract
Schneider misinterpreted the rhetorical question about the second law, which the authors firmly believe not violated. Their main purpose is to show, under the Boussinesq approximation and the Navier‐Stokes, there exist non‐trivial solutions even for quiescent boundary...
Paper Details
Title
Reply to comments by W. Schneider concerning the paper by M. Miklavčič and C. Y. Wang “Completely passive natural convection” ZAMM 91(7), 601–606 (2011)
Published Date
Nov 8, 2011
Volume
91
Issue
12
Pages
1004 - 1004
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.