Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for information systems experts: coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals

Published on Oct 1, 2004in Information Systems Journal3.29
· DOI :10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00177.x
Juhani Iivari29
Estimated H-index: 29
(University of Oulu),
Rudy Hirschheim55
Estimated H-index: 55
(LSU: Louisiana State University),
Heinz K. Klein28
Estimated H-index: 28
(TU: Temple University)
This paper introduces the idea of coding a practically relevant body of knowledge (BoK) in Information Systems (IS) that could have major benefits for the field. In its main part, the paper focuses on the question if and how an underlying body of action-oriented knowledge for IS experts could be distilled from the IS research literature. For this purpose the paper identifies five knowledge areas as the most important parts for an IS expert's BoK. Two of these are claimed as dis- tinct areas of competence for IS experts: IS application knowledge and IS devel- opment (ISD) process knowledge. The paper focuses particularly on ISD process knowledge because it allows the organizing of practically relevant IS knowledge in an action-oriented way. The paper presents some evidence for the claim that a considerable body of practically relevant IS process knowledge might, indeed, exist, but also notes that it is highly dispersed in the IS literature. It then argues that the IS research community should take stock of this knowledge and organize it in an action-oriented way. Based on results from prior work it proposes a four-level hierarchical coding scheme for this purpose. In order to test the idea of coding action-oriented knowledge for IS experts, the paper reports the results of a coded literature analysis of ISD research articles published from 1996 to 2000 in two leading IS journals - Information Systems Journal and MIS Quarterly. The results suggest that ISD approaches form a useful framework for organizing practically rel- evant IS knowledge.
  • References (84)
  • Citations (120)
May 3, 2003 in ICSE (International Conference on Software Engineering)
#1Pekka AbrahamssonH-Index: 31
#2Juhani Warsta (University of Oulu)H-Index: 7
Last.Jussi RonkainenH-Index: 4
view all 4 authors...
#1Lars Mathiassen (AAU: Aalborg University)H-Index: 39
#2Sandeep Purao (AAU: Aalborg University)H-Index: 20
#1Joseph Feller (UCC: University College Cork)H-Index: 19
#2Brian Fitzgerald (UCC: University College Cork)H-Index: 41
#1C. James Bacon (UCC: University College Cork)H-Index: 1
#2Brian Fitzgerald (UCC: University College Cork)H-Index: 41
Cited By120
#1Kazem Haki (HSG: University of St. Gallen)H-Index: 2
#2Michael Blaschke (HSG: University of St. Gallen)H-Index: 1
Last.Robert Winter (HSG: University of St. Gallen)H-Index: 34
view all 4 authors...
#1Viswanath Venkatesh (UA: University of Arkansas)H-Index: 55
#2Arun Rai (J. Mack Robinson College of Business)H-Index: 47
Last.Likoebe M. Maruping (J. Mack Robinson College of Business)H-Index: 16
view all 3 authors...
Jan 1, 2017 in HICSS (Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences)
#1Joseph W. Weiss (Bentley University)H-Index: 13
#1Dimitrios Mitroulis (UoM: University of Macedonia)
#2Fotis Kitsios (UoM: University of Macedonia)H-Index: 6
#1Leila Zemmouchi-Ghomari (USTHB: University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene)H-Index: 2
#2Dihya Ferhat (USTHB: University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene)
Last.Nour el houda Chellali (USTHB: University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene)
view all 3 authors...
#1Liqiang Chen (UWEC: University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire)H-Index: 6
#2Jean A. Pratt (UWEC: University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire)H-Index: 6
Last.Carey Cole (JMU: James Madison University)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
View next paperThe nature of theory in information systems