Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.
Abstract
Peer review is a gatekeeper, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but it has been criticized in relation to traditional psychological research criteria of reliability, validity, generalizability, and potential biases. Despite a considerable literature, there is surprisingly little sound peer-review research examining these criteria or strategies for improving the process. This article summarizes the authors' research program with the...
Paper Details
Title
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.
Published Date
Jan 1, 2008
Journal
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
160 - 168
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History