Match!

PAPER PRESENTED AT INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INCREASING WHEAT YIELD POTENTIAL, CIMMYT, OBREGON, MEXICO, 20–24 MARCH 2006 Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat

Published on Apr 1, 2007in The Journal of Agricultural Science1.33
· DOI :10.1017/S0021859607006843
R. A. Fischer1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research)
Sources
Abstract
The present paper focuses on the physiology of yield potential in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), because breeding progress in yield potential has overtaken farm yield progress. The paper examines developments largely in the last 10 years seeking routes to higher yield potential. Lately this subject has come under pressure from two new imperatives: perceived slowing of genetic progress and ambitious functional genomics. Analysis of trials between 1996 and 2005 at the CIANO research centre in northwest Mexico suggests that yield potential progress in CIMMYT spring wheats has slowed to around 0-50 % per year, but has not ceased there nor in winter wheats elsewhere. Meanwhile, in the last 10 years or so, physiological understanding has advanced somewhat. Increased kernel number/m 2 remains strongly associated with genetic progress in grain yield, and new research reinforces the importance of spike dry weight (g/m 2 ) at anthesis in its determination. Lengthening the spike growth period through manipulation of sensitivity to photoperiod looks promising, but more attention to kernels per unit of spike weight is also urged. With respect to plant height, an optimum somewhere between 0-7 and 1.0 m is accepted and we are moving away from infatuation with the Norin 10 dwarfing genes as a way of reaching that. What has not been achieved is good lodging resistance in all short spring wheats, nor a complete understanding of its physiological basis. New information is coming to light on the possible role of stored stem reserves at anthesis, for these reserves appear to have increased as yield potential has increased. Part of the benefit may be related to assimilate supply per kernel around anthesis, which new understanding suggests is important for maximum potential kernel weight. Nevertheless, results continue to suggest that despite more kernels/m 2 , the most recent wheats are still largely sink-limited during grain filling. Growing evidence from spring and winter wheat (and from rice and maize) now points to the importance of increased photosynthetic activity before and around flowering for recent genetic increases in yield potential. This opens up new possibilities for selection in field plots. Finally, attention is given to effects of weather on yield potential and recent advances in techniques for elucidating the physiological basis of genotype by year interactions. From physiological understanding such as described, traits can be suggested as possible selection criteria for yield potential. However, apart from the ACIAR/ CIMMYT project looking at stomatal aperture-related traits as well as source and sink traits (Condon et al., in press; Reynolds et al. , in press; van Ginkel et al., in press), there appear to have been few attempts to validate physiological (or morphological) selection criteria for wheat yield potential in the last decade, but recent promising results with spectral reflection indices could foreshadow more validation work. This contrasts with efforts to improve the performance of wheat (and maize) under water-limited conditions, and with the new plant type and super rice approaches of IRRI and China, respectively. Such research could be mapped out for wheat yield potential improvement, and could lead to more efficient breeding for yield potential and/or faster progress, but it requires a multidisciplinary team, including, nowadays, molecular biologists.
  • References (0)
  • Citations (179)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
143 Citations
3 Authors (J. C. Zadoks, ..., C. F. Konzak)
6,228 Citations
20051.64Crop Science
4 Authors (V. J. Shearman, ..., M.J. Foulkes)
409 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References0
Newest
Cited By179
Newest
#1Ariel Ferrante (University of Lleida)H-Index: 8
#2Roxana Savin (University of Lleida)H-Index: 31
Last. Gustavo A. Slafer (University of Lleida)H-Index: 62
view all 3 authors...
Abstract In a previous paper (Field Crops Res. 203, 114–127), we showed that the difference in yield potential between a contemporary and a traditional cultivar was due to differences in fruiting efficiency, likely derived from differences in spike fertility (fertile florets per spike) while having similar spike dry weights at anthesis. In this study, we determined the mechanistic bases of these genotypic differences in spike fertility analysing the initiation of all floret primordia per spike (...
Source
#1Nicole Pretini (CONICET: National Scientific and Technical Research Council)H-Index: 1
#2Leonardo Sebastián Vanzetti (INTA: International Trademark Association)H-Index: 12
Last. Fernanda G. González (CONICET: National Scientific and Technical Research Council)H-Index: 17
view all 8 authors...
KEY MESSAGE This study identified and validated two QTL associated with spike fertile floret and fruiting efficiencies. They represent two new loci to use in MAS to improve wheat yield potential. The spike fruiting efficiency (FE-grains per unit spike dry weight at anthesis, GN/SDW) is a promising trait to improve wheat yield potential. It depends on fertile floret efficiency (fertile florets per unit SDW-FFE, FF/SDW) and grain set (grains per fertile floret-GST). Given its difficult measurement...
Source
#1Romulo P. Lollato (KSU: Kansas State University)H-Index: 9
#2Kraig L. Roozeboom (KSU: Kansas State University)H-Index: 14
Last. Gretchen F. Sassenrath (KSU: Kansas State University)H-Index: 13
view all 5 authors...
2 CitationsSource
#1Matthew J. Paul (Rothamsted Research)H-Index: 42
#2Amy Watson (Rothamsted Research)H-Index: 1
Last. Cara A. Griffiths (Rothamsted Research)H-Index: 11
view all 3 authors...
Understanding processes in sources and sinks that contribute to crop yields has taken years of painstaking research. For crop yield improvement, processes need to be understood as standalone mechanisms in addition to how these mechanisms perform at the crop level; currently there is often a chasm between the two. Fundamental mechanisms need to be considered in the context of crop ideotypes and the agricultural environment which is often more water than carbon limited. Different approaches for im...
7 CitationsSource
#1Guillermo Sebastián Gerard (U of S: University of Saskatchewan)
#2Leonardo A. Crespo-Herrera (CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center)H-Index: 13
Last. Sridhar Bhavani (CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center)H-Index: 24
view all 12 authors...
Abstract The effects of climate change together with the projected future demand represents a huge challenge for wheat production systems worldwide. Wheat breeding can contribute to global food security through the creation of genotypes exhibiting stress tolerance and higher yield potential. The objectives of our study were to (i) estimate the annual grain yield (GY) genetic gain of High Rainfall Wheat Yield Trials (HRWYT) grown from 2007 (15th HRWYT) to 2016 (24th HRWYT) across international en...
Source
#1Baoping Zhao (Inner Mongolia Agricultural University)
#2Bao-Luo Ma (AAFC: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada)H-Index: 36
Last. Jinghui Liu (Inner Mongolia Agricultural University)H-Index: 2
view all 4 authors...
There is limited knowledge about the effects of the severity and timing of drought stress on oat (Avena sativa) yield and the critical stages at which water management could be effectively implemented. A controlled study was conducted to identify a variety-specific critical stage, and to examine the physiological mechanisms of drought stress on photosynthesis (Pn) and yield formation in two contrasting genotypes. We found that compared with sufficient water supply (AW), grain yield was reduced b...
Source
#1Sourav MaityH-Index: 1
Last. Saikat DasH-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Photosynthesis could be improved by increasing photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area and by optimizing light interception and utilization through modified canopy architecture, and also by modifying photosynthetic duration. The yield potential of wheat is determined by the accumulated photosynthates over the entire growing season or the fraction of the total biomass partitioned into grain at harvest. Significant correlation between grain yield and net photosynthesis rate was found under controll...
Source
#1Meng Zhang (CAU: China Agricultural University)H-Index: 4
#2Yanmei Gao (CAU: China Agricultural University)H-Index: 1
Last. Yinghua Zhang (CAU: China Agricultural University)H-Index: 10
view all 9 authors...
Source
#1Richard A. Richards (CSIRO: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation)H-Index: 51
#2Colin Cavanagh (CSIRO: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation)H-Index: 21
Last. Penny RiffkinH-Index: 9
view all 3 authors...
Abstract In wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) canopy architecture influences light penetration into the canopy and radiation use efficiency particularly during the period between stem elongation and anthesis which is the critical time for the determination of yield. Despite large differences in canopy architecture among spring wheat genotypes, ranging from erectophile to planophile upper leaves, there is little prior evidence to suggest that selection for canopy architecture influences yield. In this...
3 CitationsSource
#1Domenico RongaH-Index: 11
#2Enrico FranciaH-Index: 21
Last. Nicola Pecchioni (Canadian Real Estate Association)H-Index: 27
view all 7 authors...
Abstract Yield of processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) increased (∼ 50%) in Italy since the 1930’s. The aim of this work was to assess the changes in yield components associated with morphological, physiological and fruit quality traits in processing tomato cultivars cropped in Italy from the mid-1930s until nowadays, introduced by breeding in six representative cultivars. Marketable yield showed an increase of 0.6% per year of release since the 1930’s. The highest marketable yield was ob...
8 CitationsSource