Match!

Factors influencing project success criteria

Published on Sep 1, 2013 in IDAACS (Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications)
· DOI :10.1109/IDAACS.2013.6662988
Bassam A. Hussein4
Estimated H-index: 4
(NTNU: Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
Abstract
This paper uses a literature review to present the risk factors that are most common to project success criteria through a project's entire life cycle. Empirical investigation and statistical analysis examined correlations between these factors. On the basis of the statistical correlations found we conclude that there are four factors in the initiation phase that could lead to the occurrence of additional risks factors in the implementation and evaluation phases. These are 1) having an incomplete set of criteria due to lack of knowledge about project context, 2) diverse and competing expectations about gains and benefits, 3) basing the project on unrealistic targets, and 4) using ambiguous criteria to describe the expected benefits or gains from the product or the project result. These factors affect all aspects of management and evaluation. The presence of these factors is also statistically correlated to the presence of other factors such as lack of organizational commitment and weakened alignment to success criteria in the performing organization and subjective assessment of the project outcome during evaluation phase.
  • References (40)
  • Citations (3)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
27 Citations
32 Citations
7 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References40
Newest
Sep 1, 2011 in IDAACS (Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications)
#1Bassam A. Hussein (NTNU: Norwegian University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 4
The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the potential of gaming simulation as a research method in project management. Gaming simulation is used for identifying the impact of ambiguity and urgency on project participants' attitudes in the early phase. By ambiguity we mean lack of clarity of goals and objectives of the project. Urgency refers to time pressure, in the sense that the project has to be completed within specified time frame. The results of the experiments shows that ambiguity and ur...
5 CitationsSource
May 19, 2011 in BIS (Business Information Systems)
#1Melinda Korzaan (MT: Middle Tennessee State University)H-Index: 3
Managing successful Information Technology (IT) projects remains a challenging and perplexing ambition in today’s complex IT environment where project deliverables continue to be brought in behind schedule, over budget, and with less functionality than originally planned. This study delves into goal commitment theory to investigate the potential role of commitment to project objectives in improving the performance of IT projects. The following two questions are considered in this research: (1) H...
10 CitationsSource
#1Ofer Zwikael (ANU: Australian National University)H-Index: 22
#2Mark J. Ahn (Willamette University)H-Index: 10
This article examines the effectiveness of current risk management practices to reduce project risk using a multinational, multi-industry study across different scenarios and cultures. A survey was administered to 701 project managers, and their supervisors, in seven industries and three diverse countries (New Zealand, Israel, and Japan), in multiple languages during the 2002–2007 period. Results of this study show that project context—industry and country where a project is executed—significant...
88 CitationsSource
Although various factors have been identified as important for accomplishing successful stakeholder management, few studies appear to have undertaken a comparative analysis of practitioners' views on the relative importance of critical success factors (CSFs) for stakeholder management in construction projects. In an attempt to fill this research gap, a questionnaire survey was conducted in Hong Kong to collect the opinions of construction practitioners regarding the relative importance of CSFs f...
41 CitationsSource
#1Elmar Kutsch (Cranfield University)H-Index: 12
#2Mark L. Hall (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 1
Abstract The management of project risk is considered a key discipline by most organisations involved in projects. Best practice project risk management processes are claimed to be self-evidently correct. However, project risk management involves a choice between which information is utilized and which is deemed to be irrelevant and hence excluded. Little research has been carried out to ascertain the manifestation of barriers to optimal project risk management such as ‘irrelevance’; the deliber...
115 CitationsSource
#1Terence Williams (University of Southampton)H-Index: 16
#2Knut Samset (NTNU: Norwegian University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 8
The importance of the front-end decision-making phase in projects is being increasingly recognized—the need to “do the right project” is on a par with “doing the project right.” This area is underrepresented in the literature, but there are a number of key themes that run throughout, identifying key issues or difficulties during this stage. This article looks at some of these themes and includes: the need for alignment between organizational strategy and the project concept; dealing with complex...
130 CitationsSource
#1Lavagnon A. Ika (UQO: Université du Québec en Outaouais)H-Index: 10
This article highlights the characteristics of articles on project success published between 1986 and 2004 in the Project Management Journal (PMJ) and the International Journal of Project Management (IJPM). The analysis covers references, concepts like project management success, project success, success criteria, and success factors; features of the samples, data collection, and analysis techniques used; and professional disciplines. The results show that research on project success is characte...
312 CitationsSource
#1Helgi Thor Ingason (University of Iceland)H-Index: 3
#2Haukur Ingi Jonasson (University of Iceland)H-Index: 2
This article provides an overview of some recent developments within the field of project management and presents metrics used to assess current trends within the discipline in order to identify its future direction. Graphical tools are introduced to measure the span and areas of emphasis within project management, such as radar diagrams and the recently introduced International Project Management Association (IPMA) “Eye of Competence.” The research shows that the discipline seems to focus incre...
35 CitationsSource
#1Graeme Thomas (ANU: Australian National University)H-Index: 3
#2Walter Fernandez (ANU: Australian National University)H-Index: 11
Abstract This paper presents findings from an exploratory study that investigated how 36 companies operating in three industry sectors in Australia define and measure Information Technology (IT) project success. Our study suggests that when success criteria are formally defined and then measured, IT project outcomes are improved and project resources are better utilized. In addition, those companies with the most effective methods for defining and measuring IT project success shared some importa...
175 CitationsSource
#1Harvey Maylor (Cranfield University)H-Index: 19
#2Richard Vidgen (University of Bath)H-Index: 30
Last. Stephen Carver (Cranfield University)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
This article reports an investigation into project managers’ perceptions of managerial complexity. Based on a multistage empirical study, elements of “what makes a project complex to manage” were identified and classified under the dimensions of mission, organization, delivery, stakeholder, or team—the MODeST model. Further, the data showed that these elements had both structural and dynamic qualities and that the elements are interdependent. Project managers are shown to be embedded in this com...
116 CitationsSource
Cited By3
Newest
#1Gabriele Hofinger Jünge (NTNU: Norwegian University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 1
#2Erlend Alfnes (NTNU: Norwegian University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 10
Last. Bjørn Andersen (NTNU: Norwegian University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate an effective project management practice focusing on planning and control. By doing so, it contributes to the debate on rethinking traditional project management practices and accentuates the need for adjustments based on the project context. Design/methodology/approach This paper extends the project management theory by proposing a lean project planning (LPP) and control framework, developed and tested in collaboration with ten eng...
Source
#1Matthias Albert (Heilbronn University)H-Index: 2
#2Patrick Balve (Heilbronn University)H-Index: 2
Last. Konrad Spang (University of Kassel)H-Index: 5
view all 3 authors...
Purpose Barnes’ Iron Triangle was one of the first attempts to evaluate project success based on time, cost and performance, which were portrayed as interdependent dimensions. Over time, these criteria were expanded and especially criteria taking the satisfaction of stakeholder groups into account are becoming more and more popular. The purpose of this paper is to find out whether specific patterns for the selection of project success criteria across various fields of applications emerged which ...
9 CitationsSource
#1Alexei Botchkarev (RyeU: Ryerson University)H-Index: 2
#2Patrick FinniganH-Index: 1
Complexity is an inherent attribute of any project. The purpose of defining and documenting complexity is to enable a project team to foresee resulting challenges in a timely manner, and take steps to alleviate them. The main contribution of this article is to present a systematic view of complexity in project management by identifying its key attributes and classifying complexity by these attributes. A “complexity taxonomy” is developed and discussed within three levels: the product, the projec...
8 CitationsSource