What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research

Volume: 25, Issue: 3, Pages: 325 - 334
Published: May 22, 2010
Abstract
We believe that journal reviewers (as well as editors and dissertation or thesis committee members) have to some extent perpetuated misconceptions about common method bias in self-report measures, including (a) that relationships between self-reported variables are necessarily and routinely upwardly biased, (b) other-reports (or other methods) are superior to self-reports, and (c) rating sources (e.g., self, other) constitute measurement...
Paper Details
Title
What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research
Published Date
May 22, 2010
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
325 - 334
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.