Dialogues between Academics and Practitioners: The Role of Generative Dialogic Encounters
Abstract
In this paper we seek to show how aspects of the thinking underpinning the relevance debate can be self-defeating. We consider the relationship between academics and practitioners from a dialogic perspective and perform a textual analysis of the ways in which ‘pro-relevance’ academics write about research. We use role analysis techniques to highlight the potential for mismatched expectations between academics and practitioners, and then consider...
Paper Details
Title
Dialogues between Academics and Practitioners: The Role of Generative Dialogic Encounters
Published Date
Sep 1, 2010
Journal
Volume
31
Issue
9-10
Pages
1341 - 1367
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History