The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality

Volume: 4, Issue: 1, Pages: e40 - e40
Published: Jan 30, 2007
Abstract
Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality science, but very little is known about the previous experiences and training that might identify high-quality peer reviewers. The reviewer selection processes of most journals, and thus the qualifications of their reviewers, are ill defined. More objective selection of peer reviewers might improve the journal peer review process and thus the quality of published...
Paper Details
Title
The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality
Published Date
Jan 30, 2007
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
e40 - e40
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.