Comparing AHP and CBA as Decision Methods to Resolve the Choosing Problem in Detailed Design

Volume: 141, Issue: 1
Published: Jan 1, 2015
Abstract
Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods can help designers address the choosing problem in building detailed design. Many, however, appear to assume that all methods are equivalent. This paper argues that differences between MCDM methods matter. The first contribution of this paper is differentiating between the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and choosing by advantages (CBA) by comparing them through an example. The second contribution...
Paper Details
Title
Comparing AHP and CBA as Decision Methods to Resolve the Choosing Problem in Detailed Design
Published Date
Jan 1, 2015
Volume
141
Issue
1
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.