CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Abstract
Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial findings nor extract information for systematic reviews. Recent methodological analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which...
Paper Details
Title
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Published Date
Mar 23, 2010
Journal
Volume
340
Issue
mar23 1
Pages
c869 - c869
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History