National peer-review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money: the Italian case
Abstract
There has been ample demonstration that bibliometrics is superior to peer-review for national research assessment exercises in the hard sciences. In this paper we examine the Italian case, taking the 2001–2003 university performance rankings list based on bibliometrics as benchmark. We compare the accuracy of the first national evaluation exercise, conducted entirely by peer-review, to other rankings lists prepared at zero cost, based on...
Paper Details
Title
National peer-review research assessment exercises for the hard sciences can be a complete waste of money: the Italian case
Published Date
Oct 31, 2012
Journal
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
311 - 324
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History