Match!

Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets

Published on Jan 1, 2014in BMC Evolutionary Biology3.04
· DOI :10.1186/1471-2148-14-82
Robert Lanfear29
Estimated H-index: 29
(National Evolutionary Synthesis Center),
Brett Calcott12
Estimated H-index: 12
(ANU: Australian National University)
+ 2 AuthorsAlexandros Stamatakis50
Estimated H-index: 50
(Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies)
Abstract
Background Partitioning involves estimating independent models of molecular evolution for different subsets of sites in a sequence alignment, and has been shown to improve phylogenetic inference. Current methods for estimating best-fit partitioning schemes, however, are only computationally feasible with datasets of fewer than 100 loci. This is a problem because datasets with thousands of loci are increasingly common in phylogenetics.
  • References (48)
  • Citations (283)
References48
Newest
#1Nicolas Lartillot (UdeM: Université de Montréal)H-Index: 36
#2Nicolas Rodrigue (AAFC: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada)H-Index: 20
Last.J. Richer (UdeM: Université de Montréal)H-Index: 21
view all 4 authors...
#1Philippe Gayral (University of Montpellier)H-Index: 16
#2José Melo-Ferreira (University of Porto)H-Index: 20
Last.Nicolas Galtier (University of Montpellier)H-Index: 49
view all 15 authors...
#1Chieh-Hsi Wu (University of Auckland)H-Index: 13
#2Marc A. Suchard (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 64
Last.Alexei J. Drummond (University of Auckland)H-Index: 58
view all 3 authors...
#1Alexis F. L. A. Powell (AMNH: American Museum of Natural History)H-Index: 5
#2F. Keith Barker (AMNH: American Museum of Natural History)H-Index: 24
Last.Scott M. Lanyon (AMNH: American Museum of Natural History)H-Index: 29
view all 3 authors...
#1Peter C. Wainwright (UC Davis: University of California, Davis)H-Index: 63
#2W. Leo Smith (FMNH: Field Museum of Natural History)H-Index: 14
Last.Thomas J. Near (Yale University)H-Index: 48
view all 9 authors...
#1Jonathan J. Fong (UPR-RP: UPRRP College of Natural Sciences)H-Index: 14
#2Jeremy M. Brown (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 15
Last.Bastien Boussau (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 29
view all 4 authors...
Cited By283
Newest
#1Daniel J.D. Natusch (Macquarie University)H-Index: 1
#2Damien Esquerré (ANU: Australian National University)H-Index: 6
Last.Stephen C. Donnellan (University of Adelaide)H-Index: 29
view all 9 authors...
#1Mathilde Dupeyron (University of Exeter)H-Index: 1
#2Kumar Saurabh Singh (University of Exeter)H-Index: 5
Last.Alexander Hayward (University of Exeter)H-Index: 16
view all 4 authors...
#1Huai-Chun Wang (Dal: Dalhousie University)H-Index: 14
#2Edward Susko (Dal: Dalhousie University)H-Index: 24
Last.Andrew J. Roger (Dal: Dalhousie University)H-Index: 56
view all 3 authors...
#1Bin‐Bin Liu (CAS: Chinese Academy of Sciences)
#2De-yuan Hong (CAS: Chinese Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 18
Last.Jun Wen (National Museum of Natural History)H-Index: 42
view all 7 authors...
#1Carolina M. Siniscalchi (USP: University of São Paulo)H-Index: 2
#2Benoît Loeuille (UFPE: Federal University of Pernambuco)H-Index: 7
Last.José Rubens Pirani (USP: University of São Paulo)H-Index: 24
view all 5 authors...
#1Cheng Zhang (CAS: Chinese Academy of Sciences)
#2Shi-Qi Li (CAS: Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Last.Xin-Fen Gao (CAS: Chinese Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 13
view all 6 authors...
View next paperGeneious Basic