The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews
Abstract
In journal peer review, editorial decisions on submitted manuscripts are informed by referees' expert recommendations; however, the choice of referees may affect these decisions. Using data from Angewandte Chemie International Edition (AC‐IE) , this study tested what would have happened if referee reports had been received in a different order. In AC‐IE 's peer‐review process, a manuscript is generally published only if two referees rate the...
Paper Details
Title
The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews
Published Date
Apr 1, 2009
Journal
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
117 - 125
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History