Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal
Abstract
Aims To explore the review process from the reviewers' perspective, including perceptions of the time taken to carry out a review, barriers to and facilitators of the review process, benefits of reviewing, opinions about blinded versus transparent reviews, how the process of reviewing might be made easier, and to assess reviewers' experience of, and training in, the peer review process. Subjects Reviewers for Medical Education invited to review...
Paper Details
Title
Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal
Published Date
Jan 1, 2005
Journal
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
90 - 97
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History