Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports

Volume: 280, Issue: 3, Pages: 237 - 237
Published: Jul 15, 1998
Abstract
Anxiety about bias, lack of accountability, and poor quality of peer review has led to questions about the imbalance in anonymity between reviewers and authors.To evaluate the effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers to the authors' identities and requiring reviewers to sign their reports.Randomized controlled trial.A general medical journal.A total of 420 reviewers from the journal's database.We modified a paper accepted for...
Paper Details
Title
Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports
Published Date
Jul 15, 1998
Journal
Volume
280
Issue
3
Pages
237 - 237
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.