Which public and why deliberate? – A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research
Abstract
Deliberative methods are of increasing interest to public health researchers and policymakers. We systematically searched the peer-reviewed literature to identify public health and health policy research involving deliberative methods and report how deliberative methods have been used. We applied a taxonomy developed with reference to health policy and science and technology studies literatures to distinguish how deliberative methods engage...
Paper Details
Title
Which public and why deliberate? – A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research
Published Date
Apr 1, 2015
Journal
Volume
131
Pages
114 - 121
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History