The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and Implications

Published on Apr 1, 2002in Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry2.43
· DOI :10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00085-8
Jonathan Gruber69
Estimated H-index: 69
(MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology),
Emmanuel Saez58
Estimated H-index: 58
(Harvard University)
A central tax policy parameter that has recently received much attention, but about which there is substantial uncertainty, is the overall elasticity of taxable income. We provide new estimates of this elasticity which address identification problems with previous work, by exploiting a long panel of tax returns to study a series of tax reforms throughout the 1980s. This identification strategy also allows us to provide new evidence on both the income effects of tax changes on taxable income, and on variation in the elasticity of taxable income by income group. We find that the overall elasticity of taxable income is approximately 0.4; the elasticity of real income, not including tax preferences, is much lower. We also estimate small income effects on tax changes on reported income, implying that the compensated and uncompensated elasticities of taxable income are very similar. We estimate that this overall elasticity is primarily due to a very elastic response of taxable income for taxpayers who have incomes above 100,000 per year, who have an elasticity of 0.57, while for those with incomes below 00,000 per year the elasticity is less than one-third as large. Moreover, high income taxpayers who itemize are particularly responsive to taxation. We then derive optimal income tax structures using these elasticities. Our estimates suggest that the optimal system for most redistributional preferences consists of a large demogrant that is rapidly taxed away for low income taxpayers, with lower marginal rates at higher income levels.
  • References (33)
  • Citations (616)
#1Bruce D. Meyer (NBER: National Bureau of Economic Research)H-Index: 41
#2Dan T. Rosenbaum (UNCG: University of North Carolina at Greensboro)H-Index: 10
Cited By616
#1María Arrazola Vacas (URJC: King Juan Carlos University)H-Index: 9
#2José de Hevia (URJC: King Juan Carlos University)H-Index: 8
Last.José Félix Sanz-Sanz (Complutense University of Madrid)H-Index: 5
view all 3 authors...
#1Fan Fan (RUC: Renmin University of China)
#2Ming Li (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)
Last.Dali L. Yang (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 17
view all 4 authors...
#1Eitan Regev (HUJI: Hebrew University of Jerusalem)
#2Michel Strawczynski (HUJI: Hebrew University of Jerusalem)H-Index: 8
#1Egbert L.W. Jongen (CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis)H-Index: 5
#2Maaike Stoel (CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis)H-Index: 1
#1Michael P. Devereux (University of Oxford)H-Index: 36
#2Niels Johannesen (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 9
Last.John Vella (University of Oxford)H-Index: 6
view all 3 authors...
View next paperLabor supply: a review of alternative approaches