Match!

Does it matter who contributes: a study on featured articles in the german wikipedia

Published on Sep 10, 2007
· DOI :10.1145/1286240.1286290
Klaus Stein10
Estimated H-index: 10
(University of Bamberg),
Claudia Hess5
Estimated H-index: 5
(University of Bamberg)
Abstract
The considerable high quality of Wikipedia articles is often accredited to the large number of users who contribute to Wikipedia's encyclopedia articles, who watch articles and correct errors immediately. In this paper, we are in particular interested in a certain type of Wikipedia articles, namely, the featured articles - articles marked by a community's vote as being of outstanding quality. The German Wikipedia has the nice property that it has two types of featured articles: excellent and worth reading. We explore on the German Wikipedia whether only the mere number of contributors makes the difference or whether the high quality of featured articles results from having experienced authors contributing with a reputation for high quality contributions. Our results indicate that it does matter who contributes.
  • References (7)
  • Citations (59)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2007WWW: The Web Conference
382 Citations
2008WWW: The Web Conference
207 Citations
201 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References7
Newest
#1Fernanda B. Viégas (IBM)H-Index: 35
#2Martin Wattenberg (IBM)H-Index: 40
Last. Matthew Mehall McKeon (IBM)H-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
We examine the procedural side of Wikipedia, the well-known internet encyclopedia. Despite the lack of structure in the underlying wiki technology, users abide by hundreds of rules and follow well-defined processes. Our case study is the Featured Article (FA) process, one of the best established procedures on the site. We analyze the FA process through the theoretical framework of commons governance, and demonstrate how this process blends elements of traditional workflow with peer production. W...
144 CitationsSource
May 8, 2007 in WWW (The Web Conference)
#1B. Thomas Adler (UCSC: University of California, Santa Cruz)H-Index: 7
#2L. de Alfaro (UCSC: University of California, Santa Cruz)H-Index: 41
We present a content-driven reputation system for Wikipedia authors. In our system, authors gain reputation when the edits they perform to Wikipedia articles are preserved by subsequent authors, and they lose reputation when their edits are rolled back or undone in short order. Thus, author reputation is computed solely on the basis of content evolution; user-to-user comments or ratings are not used. The author reputation we compute could be used to flag new contributions from low-reputation aut...
382 CitationsSource
#2Honglei ZengH-Index: 3
Last. Mayukh BhaowalH-Index: 1
view all 6 authors...
As collaborative repositories grow in popularity and use, issues concerning the quality and trustworthiness of information grow. Some current popular repositories contain contributions from a wide variety of users, many of which will be unknown to a potential end user. Additionally the content may change rapidly and information that was previously contributed by a known user may be updated by an unknown user. End users are now faced with more challenges as they evaluate how much they may want to...
78 Citations
#1Nikolaos Korfiatis (CBS: Copenhagen Business School)H-Index: 14
#2Marios Poulos (Ionian University)H-Index: 10
Last. George D. Bokos (Ionian University)H-Index: 6
view all 3 authors...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present an approach to evaluating contributions in collaborative authoring environments, and in particular, Wikis using social network measures.Design/methodology/approach – A social network model for Wikipedia has been constructed, and metrics of importance such as centrality have been defined. Data has been gathered from articles belonging to the same topic using a web crawler, in order to evaluate the outcome of the social network measures in the arti...
121 CitationsSource
Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds. UPDATE: see details of how the data were collected for this article in the supplementary information. UPDATE 2 (28 March 2006). The results reported in this news story and their interpretation have been disputed by Encyclopaedia Britannica. Nature responded to these objections .
1,373 CitationsSource
#1Besiki Stvilia (UIUC: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign)H-Index: 19
#2Michael B. TwidaleH-Index: 29
Last. Les Gasser (NCSA: National Center for Supercomputing Applications)H-Index: 32
view all 4 authors...
Effective information quality analysis needs powerful yet easy ways to obtain metrics. The English version of Wikipedia provides an extremely interesting yet challenging case for the study of Information Quality dynamics at both macro and micro levels. We propose seven IQ metrics which can be evaluated automatically and test the set on a representative sample of Wikipedia content. The methodology of the metrics construction and the results of tests, along with a number of statistical characteriz...
211 Citations
Virtual communities constitute a building block of the information society. These organizations appear capable to guarantee unique outcomes in voluntary association since they cancel physical distance and ease the process of searching for like-minded individuals. In particular, open source communities, devoted to the collective production of public goods, show efficiency properties far superior to the traditional institutional solutions to the public goods issue (e.g. property rights enforcement...
120 CitationsSource
Cited By59
Newest
#1Aili Shen (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 1
#2Bahar Salehi (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 6
Last. Jianzhong Qi (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
The quality of a document is affected by various factors, including grammaticality, readability, stylistics, and expertise depth, making the task of document quality assessment a complex one. In this paper, we explore this task in the context of assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles. Observing that the visual rendering of a document can capture implicit quality indicators that are not present in the document text - such as images, font choices, and visual layout - we propose a joint model ...
1 CitationsSource
#1Aili Shen (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 1
#2Bahar Salehi (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 6
Last. Jianzhong Qi (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
The quality of a document is affected by various factors, including grammaticality, readability, stylistics, and expertise depth, making the task of document quality assessment a complex one. In this paper, we explore this task in the context of assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles and academic papers. Observing that the visual rendering of a document can capture implicit quality indicators that are not present in the document text --- such as images, font choices, and visual layout --- w...
#1Hengyi Fu (FSU: Florida State University)H-Index: 4
#2Sanghee Oh (CNU: Chungnam National University)H-Index: 13
Abstract The purpose of the current study is to identify the user criteria and data-driven features, both textual and non-textual, for assessing the quality of answers posted on social questioning and answering sites (social Q&A) across four different knowledge domains—Science, Technology, Art and Recreation. A comprehensive review of literature on quality assessment of information produced in social contexts was carried out to develop the theoretical framework for the current study. A total of ...
1 CitationsSource
#1Arto Lanamäki (University of Oulu)H-Index: 6
#2Juho Lindman (Information Technology University)H-Index: 11
Research on online communities has shown that content production involves manifest groups and latent users. This paper conceptualizes a related but distinct phenomenon of latent groups. We ground this contribution in a longitudinal study on the Finnish Wikipedia (2007---2014). In the case of experts working on content within their area of expertise, individuals can constitute a group that maintains itself over time. In such a setting, it becomes viable to view the group as an acting unit instead...
1 CitationsSource
Source
#1Quang-Vinh Dang (University of Lorraine)H-Index: 5
#2Claudia-Lavinia Ignat (University of Lorraine)H-Index: 13
Wikipedia is considered as the largest knowledge repository in the history of humanity and plays a crucial role in modern daily life. Assigning the correct quality class to Wikipedia articles is an important task in order to provide guidance for both authors and readers of Wikipedia. The manual review cannot cope with the editing speed of Wikipedia. An automatic classification is required to classify the quality of Wikipedia articles. Most existing approaches rely on traditional machine learning...
12 CitationsSource
#1Antonio Eleazar Serrano-López (ISCIII: Carlos III Health Institute)H-Index: 5
#2Peter Ingwersen (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 30
Last. Elías Sanz-Casado (ISCIII: Carlos III Health Institute)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
This paper is a result of the WOW project (Wind power On Wikipedia) which forms part of the SAPIENS (Scientometric Analyses of the Productivity and Impact of Eco-economy of Spain) project (Sanz-Casado et al. in Scientometrics 95(1):197–224, 2013). WOW is designed to observe the relationship between scholarly publications and societal impact or visibility through the mentions of scholarly papers (journal articles, books and conference proceedings papers) in the Wikipedia, English version. We dete...
6 CitationsSource
This study complements previous research on e-reputation by exploring how social media influence corporate e-reputation by extending the circle of stakeholders who can influence, even indirectly, a company’s e-reputation. We also suggest a new way of measuring corporate e-reputation and its determinants. We quantitatively analyze the effect of Wikipedia and its key features on the corporate e-reputation of companies that are listed on the French stock market SBF 120®. Our results show that Wikip...
Source
#1Aili ShenH-Index: 1
#2Jianzhong QiH-Index: 12
Last. Timothy BaldwinH-Index: 44
view all 3 authors...
5 Citations
#1Quang-Vinh DangH-Index: 5
Wikipedia is a great example of large scale collaboration, where people from all over the world together build the largest and maybe the most important human knowledge repository in the history. However, a number of studies showed that the quality of Wikipedia articles is not equally distributed. While many articles are of good quality, many others need to be improved. Assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles is very important for guiding readers towards articles of high quality and suggestin...
16 CitationsSource