Match!

Complementary Frameworks of Scientific Inquiry: Hypothetico-Deductive, Hypothetico-Inductive, and Observational-Inductive

Published on Jan 1, 2009in World Futures
· DOI :10.1080/02604020701845624
Farzad Mahootian1
Estimated H-index: 1
(ASU: Arizona State University),
Timothy E. Eastman4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Silver Spring Networks)
Cite
Abstract
The 20th century philosophy of science began on a positivistic note. Its focal point was scientific explanation and the hypothetico-deductive (HD) framework of explanation was proposed as the standard of what is meant by “science.” HD framework, its inductive and statistical variants, and other logic-based approaches to modeling scientific explanation were developed long before the dawn of the information age. Since that time, the volume of observational data and power of high performance computing have increased by several orders of magnitude and reshaped the practice and concept of science, and indeed, the philosophy of science. A new observational-inductive (OI) framework for scientific research is emerging due to recent developments in sensors, data systems, computers, and knowledge discovery techniques. We examine the nature of these changes and their impact on the question of what is meant by “science” after discussing five examples of the OI framework, and conclude that the HD and OI frameworks are...
  • References (33)
  • Citations (14)
Cite
References33
Newest
#1A. Keiling (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 18
#2G. K. Parks (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 58
Last.B. Klecker (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 56
view all 10 authors...
#1A. Keiling (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 18
#2G. K. Parks (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 58
Last.W. Lotko (Dartmouth College)H-Index: 31
view all 8 authors...
#1Timothy E. Eastman (GSFC: Goddard Space Flight Center)H-Index: 2
#2Kirk D. Borne (GMU: George Mason University)H-Index: 21
Last.Donald M. Sawyer (GSFC: Goddard Space Flight Center)H-Index: 1
view all 6 authors...
#1L. Rastätter (GSFC: Goddard Space Flight Center)H-Index: 18
#2Michael Hesse (GSFC: Goddard Space Flight Center)H-Index: 56
Last.Tamas I. Gombosi (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 66
view all 6 authors...
#1Dane Morgan (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 38
#2Gerbrand Ceder (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 99
Last.Stefano Curtarolo (Duke University)H-Index: 38
view all 3 authors...
#1Adam J. Burgasser (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 58
#2Michael W. McElwain (UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles)H-Index: 13
Last.I. Neill Reid (STScI: Space Telescope Science Institute)H-Index: 2
view all 6 authors...
#1Christopher Potter (ARC: Ames Research Center)H-Index: 40
#2Pang Ning Tan (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 35
Last.Vanessa Genovese (California State University, Monterey Bay)H-Index: 14
view all 7 authors...
Cited By14
Newest
#1Burkhard Priemer (Humboldt University of Berlin)H-Index: 3
#2Katja Eilerts (Humboldt University of Berlin)H-Index: 2
Last.Annette Upmeier zu Belzen (Humboldt University of Berlin)H-Index: 6
view all 7 authors...
#1Michael A. Peters (University of Waikato)H-Index: 33
#2Tze-Chang Liu (THU: Tunghai University)H-Index: 3
Last.David J. Ondercin (UIUC: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
View next paperThe Scientific Methods of Biology, Starting with Charles Darwin