A mechanism for revising accreditation standards: a study of the process, resources required and evaluation outcomes
Abstract
The study objective was to identify and describe the process, resources and expertise required for the revision of accreditation standards, and report outcomes arising from such activities. Secondary document analysis of materials from an accreditation standards development agency. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ (RACGP) documents, minutes and reports related to the revision of the accreditation standards were examined....
Paper Details
Title
A mechanism for revising accreditation standards: a study of the process, resources required and evaluation outcomes
Published Date
Nov 21, 2014
Journal
Volume
14
Issue
1
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History