Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding

Volume: 383, Issue: 1, Pages: 49 - 55
Published: Mar 27, 1998
Abstract
Background: A shorter duration of postoperative ileus and earlier oral alimentation of patients may be a clinically relevant benefit of laparoscopic compared with conventional colorectal resection. Patients/Methods: A total of 60 patients were randomised to either laparoscopic (n=30) or conventional (n=30) resection of colorectal tumours. Major endpoints were the postoperative time to the first bowel movement and the time until oral feeding...
Paper Details
Title
Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding
Published Date
Mar 27, 1998
Volume
383
Issue
1
Pages
49 - 55
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.