Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: methodology and empirical application

Published on Mar 1, 2005in Strategic Management Journal5.572
· DOI :10.1002/smj.442
Shantanu Dutta35
Estimated H-index: 35
(SC: University of Southern California),
Om Narasimhan11
Estimated H-index: 11
(UMN: University of Minnesota),
Surendra Rajiv6
Estimated H-index: 6
(NUS: National University of Singapore)
This paper attempts to operationalize and measure firm-specific capabilities using an extant conceptualization in the resource-based view (RBV) literature. Capabilities are conceived as the efficiency with which a firm employs a given set of resources (inputs) at its disposal to achieve certain objectives (outputs). We expand on extant theoretical literature on relative capabilities, by delineating the conditions that have to be met for relative capabilities to be measured non-tautologically. We then proceed to suggest an estimation methodology, stochastic frontier estimation (SFE), that allows us to infer firm capabilities. We illustrate this technique with a sample of firms in the semiconductor industry. Our findings underscore the heterogeneity in R& D capability across firms in this industry, as well as the persistence in these capabilities over time. We also find that the market rewards high R& D capability firms, in that they show the highest average values of Tobin's q. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • References (24)
  • Citations (325)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
6,450 Citations
3,973 Citations
1 Author (Edith Penrose)
12.4k Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Michel A. Habib (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 14
#2Alexander Ljungqvist (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 36
We examine the relation between firm value and managerial incentives in a sample of 1,487 U.S. firms in 1992-1997, for which the separation of ownership and control is complete. Unlike previous studies, we employ a measure of relative performance which compares a firm’s actual Tobin’s Q to the Q of a hypothetical fully-efficientfirm having the same inputs and characteristics as the original firm. We find that the Q of the average firm in our sample is around 10% lower than its Q, equivalent ...
134 CitationsSource
#1William GreeneH-Index: 1
In this paper we deal with the estimation of the stochastic frontier model using panel data. Panel data provide a fruitful setting for analyzing firm efficiency and a rich proving ground for the development of useful new techniques. We discuss three classes of models, fixed effects, random parameters, and latent classes, that should provide promising platforms for researchers.
25 Citations
#1Oliver E. Williamson (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 72
Business strategy is a complex subject and is usefully examined from several perspectives. This paper applies the lenses of governance and competence to the study of strategy. Both the governance and the competence perspectives have had the benefit of distinguished antecedents. They have also had to deal with tautological reputations. I begin with the governance perspective, with emphasis on the six key moves through which it has been operationalized. I then examine the competence perspective in...
1,198 CitationsSource
#1Shantanu Dutta (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 35
#2Om Narasimhan (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 11
Last. Surendra Rajiv (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 10
view all 3 authors...
We propose a conceptual framework-with the resource-based view RBV of the firm as its theoretical underpinning-to explain interfirm differences in firms' profitability in high-technology markets in terms of differences in their functional capabilities. Specifically, we suggest that marketing, R&D, and operations capabilities, along with interactions among these capabilities, are important determinants of relative financial performance within the industry. This paper contributes to the RBV litera...
459 CitationsSource
#1David J. Collis (Harvard University)H-Index: 16
#2Cynthia A. Montgomery (Harvard University)H-Index: 19
As recently as ten years ago, we thought we knew most of what we needed to know about strategy. Portfolio planning, the experience curve, PIMS, Porter's five forces-tools like these brought rigor and legitimacy to strategy at both the business-unit and the corporate level. Leading companies, such as General Electric, built large staffs that reflected growing confidence in the value of strategic planning. Strategy consulting boutiques expanded rapidly and achieved widespread recognition. How diff...
1,052 CitationsSource
#1David J. Teece (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 74
#2Gary P. Pisano (Harvard University)H-Index: 42
Last. Amy Shuen (SJSU: San Jose State University)H-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
The dynamic capabilities framework analyzes the sources and methods of wealth creation and capture by private enterprise firms operating in environments of rapid technological change. The competitive advantage of firms is seen as resting on distinctive processes (ways of coordinating and combining), shaped by the firm's (specific) asset positions (such as the firm's portfolio of difftcult-to- trade knowledge assets and complementary assets), and the evolution path(s) it has aflopted or inherited...
18k CitationsSource
#1Constance E. Helfat (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 33
Dynamic capabilities enable firms to create new products and processes and respond to changing market conditions. This empirical investigation of dynamic R&D capabilities deals with the role of complementary know-how and other assets in the context of changing conditions in the U.S. petroleum industry during the 1970s and early 1980s. The analysis suggests that, in response to rising oil prices, firms with larger amounts of complementary technological knowledge and physical assets also undertook...
825 CitationsSource
Some aspects of the econometric estimation of production functions are discussed, focussing primarily on the issue of simultaneity and reviewing the stream of criticisms of Douglas' work and the response to it. We look in particular at the work that uses panel data on micro data for plants or firms and at some more recent multi-equation extensions of it. We find that researchers, in trying to evade the simultaneity problem, have shifted to the use of thinner and thinner slices of data, exacerbat...
850 CitationsSource
#1Rita Gunther McGrath (Columbia University)H-Index: 31
#2Ian C. MacMillan (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 41
Last. Sankaran Venkataraman (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 28
view all 3 authors...
In this paper, competence is defined in operational terms as the degree to which the firm or its subunits can reliably meet or exceed objectives. Two antecedents to competence (and thus competitive advantage) are then developed and defined. These are the ‘comprehension’ of the management team working on developing competence and the ‘deftness’ of their task execution. Empirical results from a study of 160 new initiatives in 40 organizations from 16 countries suggest that: (1) it is feasible to o...
411 CitationsSource
#1Rebecca Henderson (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 36
#2Iain M. Cockburn (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 41
Renewed interest in the resource-based theory of the firm has focused attention on the role of heterogeneous organizational ‘competence’ in competition. This paper attempts to measure the importance of these effects in the context of pharmaceutical research. We distinguish between ‘component’ and ‘architectural’ competence, and using internal firm data at the program level from 10 major pharmaceutical companies show that together the two forms of competence appear to explain a significant fracti...
2,005 CitationsSource
Cited By325
#1Yang Ye (SWUFE: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
#2Wei Yu (NUS: National University of Singapore)H-Index: 3
Last. Robert S. Nason (Concordia University)H-Index: 11
view all 3 authors...
Firms use aspirations to regulate innovative search activities, but peer and historical referents may contain different signals regarding performance feedback. Integrating insights from the literat...
#1Daphne L.M. Yiu (MUST: Macau University of Science and Technology)
#2Hugo K.S. Lam (University of Liverpool)H-Index: 4
Last. T.C.E. Cheng (PolyU: Hong Kong Polytechnic University)H-Index: 69
view all 4 authors...
Last. Muhammed Zakir HossainH-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
This paper addresses the mediating effect of structural infrastructure capability on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and SMEs performance in emerging economies, focusing on Nigeria. It addresses the need to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are able to overcome the inherent challenges in their external environment actively and, thus, contribute to economic growth through internal management variables.,The study adopted a survey design, utilising a sa...
#1Leopoldo J. Gutierrez-Gutierrez (UGR: University of Granada)H-Index: 9
#2Vanesa Barrales-Molina (UGR: University of Granada)H-Index: 9
Last. Beatriz López-Morales (UGR: University of Granada)
view all 4 authors...
#1Xuchuan Yuan (NUS: National University of Singapore)
#2Rohit Nishant (Laval University)H-Index: 6
Last. Rohit Nishant (Laval University)
view all 2 authors...
Abstract Time delays and feedback loops often introduce nonlinear, dynamic, chaotic, or disorderly business patterns. In this paper, we argue that a firm’s growth driven by R&D can also exhibit chaotic behavior, through a simple model, where R&D has two distinct impacts on its revenue through the demand-inducing and cost-increasing effects. On the basis of a revenue-based investment strategy with anchoring and adjustment, the firm’s growth dynamics are characterized by a two-dimensional dynamica...
#1Magnus Johansson (Lund University)H-Index: 6
#2Matts Kärreman (Lund University)H-Index: 3
Last. Amalia Foukaki (Lund University)
view all 3 authors...
Abstract This study examines the interdependence between research and development (R&D) resources, coopetitive performance, and extent of cooperation in development-related standardization settings that involve network effects. Coopetitive performance is measured as the firm's influence on the change process of standards. Cooperation is measured as the number of firm technology partners in influencing industry technology standards. From a dataset of 152,959 decisions drawn from the 3rd Generatio...