Match!

Experimental Economics from the Vantage-Point of Behavioural Economics

Published on Feb 1, 1999in The Economic Journal
· DOI :10.1111/1468-0297.00400
George Loewenstein105
Estimated H-index: 105
(CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)
Sources
Abstract
As a behavioural economist (an economist who brings psychological insights to bear on economic phenomena), preparing a controversy corner piece criticising experimental economics (the use of experimentation to address economic questions) is like working yourself up to enter the boxing ring against a friend. Experimental economics and behavioural economics have much in common. Both groups can trace their origins to psychology psychological theory in one case and experimentation in the other. Both subfields came of age in the last quarter of this century, and have gained growing acceptance within the discipline of economics as measured by almost any criterion: publications in mainstream journals, academic positions in top departments, prominence at meetings, etc.. In the current climate it is easy to forget that only 20 years ago the simple fact that an article reported experiments or discussed psychology was regarded by many editors as grounds for summary rejection. Perhaps more importantly, many behavioural economists (BEs) use economics-style experiments, and some experimental economists (EEs) embrace psychology. Indeed, some researchers would find it difficult to classify themselves into one group or the other, and would be embraced by both groups as one of their own. There is, therefore no inherent conflict between the two approaches; indeed, there is good cause for synergistic coexistence. Nevertheless, there is often value in obtaining another field's perspective on what one does. Some EEs have not been particularly reticent about providing BEs with such input (see, e.g., Smith, 199 1). In this essay I attempt to return the favour in a small way. There are, in fact, many differences between the two subfields, the most important of which is one of basic orientation. BEs are methodological eclectics. They define themselves, not on the basis of the research methods that they employ, but rather their application of psychological insights to economics. In recent published research, BEs are as likely to use field research as experimentation (see, e.g., Camerer et al., 1997; Babcock et al., 1996). EEs on the other hand, define themselves on the basis of their endorsement and use of experimentation as a research tool. Consistent with this orientation, EEs have made a major investment in developing novel experimental methods that are suitable for addressing economic issues, and have achieving a virtual consensus among themselves on a number of important methodological
  • References (13)
  • Citations (273)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1,197 Citations
32k Citations
1,328 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References13
Newest
#1Ronit BodnerH-Index: 1
THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF ACTIONS IN A SELF-SIGNALING MODELRonit Bodner and Drazen PrelecWhen we make a choice we reveal something of our dispositions and character, not just toothers, but also to ourselves. After the fact, this can be a source of pleasure or pain, dependingon whether we were impressed or disappointed by our own choices. Before the fact, theanticipation of future pride or remorse can influence what we choose to do.The paper translates these statements into a model of quasi-rationa...
40 Citations
In common value auction experiments, individual judgment errors significantly alter market outcomes relative to standard economic formulations. Experienced bidders show sensitivity to the strategic considerations underlying the auction but not to item valuation considerations. Nash equilibrium models accurately characterize auctions with small numbers of bidders_(3-4). However, auctions with large numbers_(6-7) produce more aggressive bidding, resulting in negative profits, the winner's curse. P...
509 CitationsSource
#1John H. KagelH-Index: 52
#2Alvin E. RothH-Index: 78
1,131 Citations
#1Linda Babcock (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 22
#2Xianghong Wang (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 3
Last. George Loewenstein (CMU: Carnegie Mellon University)H-Index: 105
view all 3 authors...
We explore the role that choice of comparison groups plays in explaining impasse in teacher contract negotiations. We hypothesize that the negotiators select "comparable" districts in a biased fashion such that teachers' salaries in districts that unions view as comparable are higher than teachers' salaries in districts that school boards view as comparable. We also predict that strike activity is positively related to the difference in the salary levels of the unions' and boards' lists of compa...
192 CitationsSource
#1Colin F. Camerer (California Institute of Technology)H-Index: 102
This chapter discusses methodological differences in the way economists and psychologists typically conduct experiments. The main argument is that methodological differences spring from basic differences in the way knowledge is created and cumulated in the two fields- especially the important role of simple, formal theory in economics which is largely absent in psychology.
35 CitationsSource
#1Miriam Bassok (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 23
#2Karen L. Olseth (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 2
We examine how cover stories of isomorphic problems affect transfer. Existing models posit that people retain content in problem representations and that similarities and differences between the “undeleted” cover stories might interfere with recognition of structural similarities.We propose that cover stories can affect transfer in another way—by inducing semantic knowledge that modifies problem structures. Two experiments examined how people represent and solve permutation problems dealing with...
124 CitationsSource
#1John H. KagelH-Index: 52
#2Alvin E. RothH-Index: 78
This book, which comprises eight chapters, presents a comprehensive critical survey of the results and methods of laboratory experiments in economics. The first chapter provides an introduction to experimental economics as a whole, with the remaining chapters providing surveys by leading practitioners in areas of economics that have seen a concentration of experiments: public goods, coordination problems, bargaining, industrial organization, asset markets, auctions, and individual decision makin...
2,265 Citations
#1Elizabeth Hoffman (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 19
#2Kevin McCabe (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 40
Last. Vernon L. Smith (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 74
view all 4 authors...
Research on ultimatum and dictator games has found that because of "fairness" first movers in such games offer more than noncooperative game theory predicts. We find that if the right to be the first mover is "earned" by scoring high on a general knowledge quiz, then first movers behave in a more self-regarding manner. We also conducted dictator double blind experiments, in which the experimenter could not identify the decision maker. The results yielded by far our largest observed incidence of ...
1,265 CitationsSource
Environments with public goods are a wonderful playground for those interested in delicate experimental problems, serious theoretical challenges, and difficult mechanism design issues. A review is made of various public goods experiments. It is found that the public goods environment is a very sensitive one with much that can affect outcomes but are difficult to control. The many factors interact with each other in unknown ways. Nothing is known for sure. Environments with public goods present a...
2,166 Citations
We report market experiments in which human traders are replaced by "zero-intelligence" programs that submit random bids and offers. Imposing a budget constraint (i.e., not permitting traders to sell below their costs or buy above their values) is sufficient to raise the allocative efficiency of these auctions close to 100 percent. Allocative efficiency of a double auction derives largely from its structure, independent of traders' motivation, intelligence, or learning. Adam Smith's invisible ha...
1,135 CitationsSource
Cited By273
Newest
#1Ayşenur Kılıç ('KCL': King's College London)
#2Wijnand A.P. van Tilburg ('KCL': King's College London)H-Index: 13
Last. Eric R. Igou (UL: University of Limerick)H-Index: 16
view all 3 authors...
We examined if boredom is associated with risk‐taking. Although this association has frequently been postulated, it has rarely been tested, and the evidence has thus far been rather indirect and speculative. We conducted three studies to test this association more systematically. In Study 1, people high in boredom proneness reported greater risk‐taking across financial, ethical, recreational, and health or safety domains. In Study 2, over a series of risky decisions, risk‐taking increased in tan...
Source
#1Anne C. Pisor (WSU: Washington State University)H-Index: 6
#2Matthew M. Gervais (SFU: Simon Fraser University)H-Index: 8
Last. Cody T. Ross (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 9
view all 4 authors...
As economic games have spread from experimental economics to other social sciences, so too have critiques of their usefulness for drawing inferences about the ‘real world’. What these criticisms of...
Source
#1Keyang Li (Radboud University Nijmegen)H-Index: 1
#2Perrine Dethier (University of Liège)H-Index: 1
Last. Jean-Marie Halleux (University of Liège)H-Index: 7
view all 7 authors...
ABSTRACTCultural impacts in planning increasingly receive attention from both academics and practitioners around Europe. However, comparative planning cultures studies face the challenges of lacking systematic comparison and empirical evidence, especially at the micro level of planning actors’ behaviour in interaction. This article aims to fill these gaps by (1) operationalizing the concept of planning culture; and (2) measuring and comparing it. We base our operationalization on the culturized ...
2 CitationsSource
#1Roy ChenH-Index: 3
#2Yan ChenH-Index: 27
Last. Yohanes E. RiyantoH-Index: 13
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Noemí Navarro (University of Bordeaux)H-Index: 4
#2Robert Ferenc Veszteg (Waseda University)H-Index: 7
Abstract We report experimental results and test axiomatic models of unstructured bargaining by checking the empirical relevance of the underlying axioms. Our data support strong efficiency, symmetry, independence of irrelevant alternatives and monotonicity, and reject scale invariance. Individual rationality and midpoint domination are violated by a significant fraction of agreements that implement equal division in highly unequal circumstances. Two well-known bargaining solutions that satisfy ...
Source
#1Matthew Fong (University of Melbourne)
#2Kun Zhao (Monash University)
Last. Luke D. Smillie (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 21
view all 3 authors...
Abstract How are basic personality traits linked with individual differences in competitiveness? We examined extraversion and agreeableness, as well as their lower-level aspects (i.e., assertiveness, enthusiasm; compassion, politeness), in relation to both self-reported competitiveness and competitive bidding within two auction games. Participants (N = 304, 56% female) completed comprehensive assessments of personality and competitiveness, along with two hypothetical auction games (a standard “W...
Source
#1Sera Linardi (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 6
#2Nita Rudra (Georgetown University)H-Index: 12
Does an individual’s exposure to aspects of globalization impact their willingness to redistribute to the poor? We hypothesize that the “glitter” of foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing co...
Source
#1Chris M. WilsonH-Index: 7
#2Anna Rita BennatoH-Index: 3
Last. Adrian GourlayH-Index: 8
view all 3 authors...
Bounded rationality is a key concept with implications across all areas of economics. To help students better understand the nature, causes and forms of bounded rationality in individual choice, we present a flexible classroom experiment. Beyond providing students with some first-hand evidence of bounded rationality, the experiment shows how a range of factors can prompt bounded rationality and illustrates how it can manifest itself in the form of different behaviours. The experiment can be cond...
Source
#1Hatice Isıl Alkan (OMU: Ondokuz Mayıs University)
Source
#1Mario J. RizzoH-Index: 6
#2Glen Whitman (CSUN: California State University, Northridge)H-Index: 1
Last. Glen WhitmanH-Index: 1
view all 2 authors...
1 Citations