Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?

Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 31 - 52
Published: Feb 1, 2004
Abstract
In large clinical trials where outcome assessment is possible using questionnaires, it may be more cost-effective to mail them to patients than to conduct interviews in-person. However, nonresponse to mailed questionnaires reduces the effective sample size and can introduce bias. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of questionnaire length on response rates. We searched 14...
Paper Details
Title
Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?
Published Date
Feb 1, 2004
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
31 - 52
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.