Personality and domain‐specific risk taking

Published on Mar 1, 2005in Journal of Risk Research1.70
· DOI :10.1080/1366987032000123856
Nigel Nicholson37
Estimated H-index: 37
(LBS: London Business School),
Emma Soane21
Estimated H-index: 21
(Kingston Business School)
+ 1 AuthorsPaul Willman19
Estimated H-index: 19
(University of Oxford)
The concept of risk propensity has been the subject of both theoretical and empirical investigation, but with little consensus about its definition and measurement. To address this need, a new scale assessing overall risk propensity in terms of reported frequency of risk behaviours in six domains was developed and applied: recreation, health, career, finance, safety and social. The paper describes the properties of the scale and its correlates: demographic variables, biographical self-reports, and the NEO PI-R, a Five Factor personality inventory ( N = 2041). There are three main results. First, risk propensity has clear links with age and sex, and with objective measures of career-related risk taking (changing jobs and setting up a business). Second, the data show risk propensity to be strongly rooted in personality. A clear Big Five pattern emerges for overall risk propensity, combining high extraversion and openness with low neuroticism, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. At the subscale level, sensation-seeking surfaces as a key important component of risk propensity. Third, risk propensity differs markedly in its distribution across job types and business sectors. These findings are interpreted as indicating that risk takers are of three non-exclusive types: stimulation seekers, goal achievers, and risk adapters. Only the first group is truly risk seeking, the others are more correctly viewed as risk bearers . The implications for risk research and management are discussed.
  • References (40)
  • Citations (388)
#1Craig R. M. McKenzie (UCSD: University of California, San Diego)H-Index: 21
#2Susanna M. Lee (UCSD: University of California, San Diego)H-Index: 1
Last.Karen K. Chen (UCSD: University of California, San Diego)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
#1John W. Boudreau (Cornell University)H-Index: 34
#2Wendy R. Boswell (A&M: Texas A&M University)H-Index: 31
Last.Robert D. Bretz (ND: University of Notre Dame)H-Index: 5
view all 4 authors...
#1Mark Simon (UR: University of Rochester)H-Index: 12
#2Susan M. Houghton (GSU: Georgia State University)H-Index: 10
Last.Karl Aquino (GSU: Georgia State University)H-Index: 43
view all 3 authors...
Cited By388
#1Fang Wang (SISU: Shanghai International Studies University)H-Index: 5
#2Xin Wang (SISU: Shanghai International Studies University)H-Index: 1
Last.Yu Pan (SISU: Shanghai International Studies University)H-Index: 1
view all 6 authors...
#1Abed Rabbani (MU: University of Missouri)H-Index: 3
#2Zheying Yao (MU: University of Missouri)
Last.Christina Wang (MU: University of Missouri)
view all 3 authors...
#1Marjon van der Pol (Aberd.: University of Aberdeen)H-Index: 19
#2Anthony Scott (University of Melbourne)H-Index: 40
Last.Alastair Irvine (Aberd.: University of Aberdeen)
view all 3 authors...
#1Robert Liñeira (UAM: Autonomous University of Madrid)
#2Ailsa Henderson (Edin.: University of Edinburgh)H-Index: 10
View next paperA Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations