Establishing the Criterion Validity and Reliability of Common Methods for Quantifying Training Load
Volume: 28, Issue: 8, Pages: 2330 - 2337
Published: Aug 1, 2014
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the criterion validity and test-retest reliability of common methods for quantifying training load. Ten (5 men and 5 women) recreational athletes (mean ± SD, VO2max: 37.0 ± 4.3 ml·kg-1·min-1; age: 23.8 ± 8.4 years) completed 18 randomly assigned steady state (SS) and interval (INT) training sessions during a 6-week period. Steady-state sessions were 18 minutes in duration and were performed at 35,...
Paper Details
Title
Establishing the Criterion Validity and Reliability of Common Methods for Quantifying Training Load
Published Date
Aug 1, 2014
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
2330 - 2337
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History