Match!

Improving the effectiveness of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a prospective observational study

Published on Oct 1, 2014in Health Services and Delivery Research
· DOI :10.3310/hsdr02370
Rosalind Raine32
Estimated H-index: 32
(UCL: University College London),
Isla Wallace5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCL: University College London)
+ 13 AuthorsJulie Barber20
Estimated H-index: 20
(UCL: University College London)
Abstract
Background Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings have been endorsed by the Department of Health as the core model for managing chronic diseases. However, the evidence for their effectiveness is mixed and the degree to which they have been absorbed into clinical practice varies widely across conditions and settings. We aimed to identify the key characteristics of chronic disease MDT meetings that are associated with decision implementation, a measure of effectiveness, and to derive a set of feasible modifications to MDT meetings to improve decision-making. Methods We undertook a mixed-methods prospective observational study of 12 MDTs in the London and North Thames area, covering cancer, heart failure, mental health and memory clinic teams. Data were collected by observation of 370 MDT meetings, completion of the Team Climate Inventory (TCI) by 161 MDT members, interviews with 53 MDT members and 20 patients, and review of 2654 patients’ medical records. We examined the influence of patient-related factors (disease, age, sex, deprivation indicator, whether or not their preferences and other clinical/health behaviours were mentioned) and MDT features (team climate and skill mix) on the implementation of MDT treatment plans. Interview and observation data were thematically analysed and integrated to explore possible explanations for the quantitative findings, and to identify areas of diverse beliefs and practice across MDT meetings. Based on these data, we used a modified formal consensus technique involving expert stakeholders to derive a set of indications of good practice for effective MDT meetings. Results The adjusted odds of implementation were reduced by 25% for each additional professional group represented [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.87], though there was some evidence of a differential effect by type of disease. Implementation was more likely in MDTs with clear goals and processes and a good team climate (adjusted odds of implementation increased by 7%; 95% CI 1% to 13% for a 0.1-unit increase in TCI score). Implementation varied by disease category (with the lowest adjusted odds of implementation in mental health teams) and by patient deprivation (adjusted odds of implementation for patients in the most compared with least deprived areas were 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.91). We ascertained 16 key themes within five domains where there was substantial diversity in beliefs and practices across MDT meetings. These related to the purpose, structure, processes and content of MDT meetings, as well as to the role of the patient. We identified 68 potential recommendations for improving the effectiveness of MDT meetings. Of these, 21 engendered both strong agreement (median ≥ 7) and low variation in the extent of agreement (mean absolute deviation from the median of < 1.11) among the expert consensus panel. These related to the purpose of the meetings (e.g. that agreeing treatment plans should take precedence over other objectives); meeting processes (e.g. that MDT decision implementation should be audited annually); content of the discussion (e.g. that information on comorbidities and past medical history should be routinely available); and the role of the patient (e.g. concerning the most appropriate time to discuss treatment options). Panellists from all specialties agreed that these recommendations were both desirable and feasible. We were unable to achieve consensus for 17 statements. In part, this was a result of disease-specific differences including the need to be prescriptive about MDT membership, with local flexibility deemed appropriate for heart failure and uniformity supported for cancer. In other cases, our data suggest that some processes (e.g. discussion of unrelated research topics) should be locally agreed, depending on the preferences of individual teams. Conclusions Substantial diversity exists in the purpose, structure, processes and content of MDT meetings. Greater multidisciplinarity is not necessarily associated with more effective decision-making and MDT decisions (as measured by decision implementation). Decisions were less likely to be implemented for patients living in more deprived areas. We identified 21 indications of good practice for improving the effectiveness of MDT meetings, which expert stakeholders from a range of chronic disease specialties agree are both desirable and feasible. These are important because MDT meetings are resource-intensive and they should deliver value to the NHS and patients. Priorities for future work include research to examine whether or not the 21 indications of good practice identified in this study will lead to better decision-making; for example, incorporating the indications into a modified MDT and experimentally evaluating its effectiveness in a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Other areas for further research include exploring the value of multidisciplinarity in MDT meetings and the reasons for low implementation in community mental health teams. There is also scope to examine the underlying determinants of the inequalities demonstrated in this study, for example by exploring patient preferences in more depth. Finally, future work could examine the association between MDT decision implementation and improvements in patient outcomes.
  • References (120)
  • Citations (22)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2 Citations
20122.93BMC Cancer
28 Citations
35 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References120
Newest
#1William O'Driscoll (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 1
#2Gill Livingston (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 62
Last. Rosalind Raine (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 32
view all 8 authors...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore physical and mental health patients’ experience of multidisciplinary team (MDT) care and decision making in order to highlight factors underlying effective care and to identify areas in which patient experience could be improved. Design/methodology/approach – Totally, 12 MDTs within the North Thames area participated; the authors recruited 13 patients from physical health MDTs and seven patients from mental health MDTs. The authors conducted semi...
4 CitationsSource
#1Rosalind Raine (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 32
#2Penny Xanthopoulou (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 4
Last. Julie Barber (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 20
view all 16 authors...
Objective Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are assumed to produce better decisions and are extensively used to manage chronic disease in the National Health Service (NHS). However, evidence for their effectiveness is mixed. Our objective was to investigate determinants of MDT effectiveness by examining factors influencing the implementation of MDT treatment plans. This is a proxy measure of effectiveness, because it lies on the pathway to improvements in health, and reflects team decision m...
19 CitationsSource
#1Mark Wilberforce (University of Manchester)H-Index: 15
#2Sue TuckerH-Index: 11
Last. David Challis (University of Manchester)H-Index: 38
view all 6 authors...
Background: Community mental health services are regarded as the preferred first tier of specialist psychogeriatric support, with integrated multidisciplinary teams believed to offer improved decision-making and greater continuity of care than separate single-profession services. In England over 400 community mental health teams (CMHTs) form the cornerstone of such support, yet research has neither assessed progress toward integrating key professional disciplines nor the nature of their membersh...
15 CitationsSource
#1Stuart J. Head (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 14
#2Sanjay Kaul (UC: University of California)H-Index: 1
Last. Arie Pieter Kappetein (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 45
view all 10 authors...
Stable complex coronary artery disease can be treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or medical therapy. Multidisciplinary decision-making has gained more emphasis over the recent years to select the most optimal treatment strategy for individual patients with stable complex coronary artery disease. However, the so-called ‘Heart Team’ concept has not been widely implemented. Yet, decision-making has shown to remain suboptimal; there is larg...
111 CitationsSource
#1Rozh Jalil (Barts Health NHS Trust)H-Index: 9
#2Maria Ahmed (St Mary's Hospital)H-Index: 9
Last. Nick Sevdalis (St Mary's Hospital)H-Index: 54
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Background It is becoming a standard practice worldwide for cancer patients to be discussed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT or ‘tumour board') in order to formulate an expert-derived management plan. Evidence suggests that MDTs do not always work optimally in making clinical decisions and that not all MDT decisions get implemented into care. We investigated factors influencing decision-making and decision implementation in cancer MDTs. Methods Semi-structured interviews were carried ou...
40 CitationsSource
#1Laura Vallejo-Torres (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 11
#2Stephen Morris (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 37
Economic analyses of equity which focus solely on horizontal inequity offer a partial assessment of socioeconomic inequity in healthcare use. We analyse income-related inequity in cardiovascular disease-related healthcare utilisation by individuals reporting cardiovascular disease in England, including both horizontal and vertical aspects. For the analysis of vertical inequity, we use target groups to estimate the appropriate relationship between healthcare needs and use. We find that including ...
9 CitationsSource
#1K Melissa Ke (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 1
#2Jane M Blazeby (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 58
Last. William Hollingworth (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 46
view all 6 authors...
Objective To investigate the cost effectiveness of management of patients within the context of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting in cancer and non-cancer teams in secondary care.
38 CitationsSource
#1B. W. Lamb (Imperial College London)H-Index: 7
#2Nick Sevdalis (Imperial College London)H-Index: 54
Last. John GreenH-Index: 33
view all 5 authors...
Background Anecdotally, organizational factors appear to have an effect on the quality of decision-making in the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. We assess the effect of the number of team-members present, number and order of cases, and the timing of meetings on the process of decision-making in MDT meetings.
35 CitationsSource
We tested whether the relationship between a team climate of support from the organization and team performance is mediated by positive team mood. Recent research has shown that this team climate facet is related to team performance, but we do not have any empirical evidence about the mechanisms involved in this relationship. The study sample was composed of 59 bank branches, and a longitudinal design with three data-collection points was implemented. The results showed that a team climate of su...
7 Citations
#1Rozh Jalil (Imperial College London)H-Index: 9
#2Benjamin W. Lamb (Imperial College London)H-Index: 13
Last. James GreenH-Index: 27
view all 5 authors...
Background The MDT-Coordinators’ role is relatively new, and as such it is evolving. What is apparent is that the coordinator’s work is pivotal to the effectiveness and efficiency of an MDT. This study aimed to assess the views and needs of MDT-coordinators.
14 CitationsSource
Cited By22
Newest
#1Jaclyn N. Portelli Tremont (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
#2Stephanie M. Downs-Canner (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 1
Last. Ugwuji Maduekwe (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Background Breast surgical oncology is a unique field that involves complex cancer management and longstanding patient interactions with the healthcare system, making it potentially challenging for patients with low health literacy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge regarding health literacy in breast cancer and identify future directions for research and potential intervention in breast surgical oncology. Data sources A search of relevant literature query...
Source
Source
#1Salamat Ali (QAU: Quaid-i-Azam University)H-Index: 1
#2Tofeeq Ur-Rehman (QAU: Quaid-i-Azam University)H-Index: 4
Last. Vibhu Paudyal (University of Birmingham)H-Index: 9
view all 6 authors...
Background Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection and chronic kidney disease add challenges to hepatitis C virus treatment. Objective To conduct a comparative study of treatment choices, drug–drug interactions and clinical outcomes in hepatitis C mono-infected patients, or those with HIV or chronic kidney disease comorbidities. Setting Hepatitis C treatment centers of West Midlands England, United Kingdom. Method An observational study was conducted analyzing datasets of all hepatitis C...
Source
#1Sarah Rae Easter (Brigham and Women's Hospital)H-Index: 5
#2Anne Marie Valente (Brigham and Women's Hospital)H-Index: 33
Last. Katherine E. Economy (Brigham and Women's Hospital)H-Index: 17
view all 3 authors...
Purpose of review Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of maternal death and cases of cardiovascular death are often associated with failure to provide timely risk-appropriate care. This review outlines considerations for creation of a team focused on the care of women with CVD during pregnancy and beyond.
Source
Introduction Urogynaecology multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings to discuss management plans prior to invasive treatments for urinary incontinence have been recommended by guidelines in the UK since 2013. Evidence for MDT discussion in urogynaecology is lacking, with only two published studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cases discussed at a secondary care urogynaecology MDT meeting, to establish types of clinical problems discussed, assess the outcomes of the MDT meeting and com...
Source
#1Isla WallaceH-Index: 5
#2Helen BarrattH-Index: 8
Last. Rosalind RaineH-Index: 32
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Purpose There are well-documented barriers to nurse participation in cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings. This paper aims to identify the approaches used by Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNSs) in this setting to contribute during discussion, and to consider the impact of these approaches on the decision making process. In doing so it aims to highlight ways that CNSs can increase their influence, and enhance multidisciplinary engagement. Methods This study is based on analysis of ...
Source
#1Lisa WoodH-Index: 54
#2Claire WilliamsH-Index: 1
Last. Sonia JohnsonH-Index: 47
view all 4 authors...
Source
#1Christian Heuser (University Hospital Bonn)H-Index: 1
#2Annika Diekmann (University Hospital Bonn)
Last. Nicole Ernstmann (University Hospital Bonn)H-Index: 20
view all 8 authors...
Background Decisions made in multidisciplinary tumor conferences (MTC) that consider patient preferences result in better patient outcomes. Furthermore, it has been shown that in some breast cancer centers in Germany, patients participate in MTCs and that participation is associated with sociodemographic and breast cancer center-related factors. Health literacy (HL) has been shown to be predictive for individual health behavior and is an important prerequisite for patient participation in health...
Source
#1Louise Cummings (PolyU: Hong Kong Polytechnic University)H-Index: 13
#1Katherine Steele (East Kent Hospitals University Nhs Foundation Trust)
#2Andy HallH-Index: 2
Last. Arvind Singh (Northwick Park Hospital)H-Index: 14
view all 5 authors...
Source