To drain or not to drain: a cumulative meta-analysis of the use of routine abdominal drains after pancreatic resection.

Hpb2.90
Volume: 15, Issue: 5, Pages: 337 - 344
Published: May 1, 2013
Abstract
Background To warrant the adoption or rejection of health care interventions in daily practice, it is important to establish the point at which the available evidence is considered sufficiently conclusive. This process must avoid bias resulting from multiple testing and take account of heterogeneity across studies. The present paper addresses the issue of whether the available evidence may be considered sufficiently conclusive to continue or...
Paper Fields
Paper Details
Title
To drain or not to drain: a cumulative meta-analysis of the use of routine abdominal drains after pancreatic resection.
Published Date
May 1, 2013
Journal
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
337 - 344
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.