Match!

Hen welfare in different housing systems

Published on Jan 1, 2011in Poultry Science2.03
· DOI :10.3382/ps.2010-00962
D. C. Lay10
Estimated H-index: 10
(USDA: United States Department of Agriculture),
R. M. Fulton14
Estimated H-index: 14
+ 8 AuthorsRobert E. Porter19
Estimated H-index: 19
Abstract
Egg production systems have become subject to heightened levels of scrutiny. Multiple factors such as disease, skeletal and foot health, pest and parasite load, behavior, stress, affective states, nutrition, and genetics influence the level of welfare hens experience. Although the need to evaluate the influence of these factors on welfare is recognized, research is still in the early stages. We compared conventional cages, furnished cages, noncage systems, and outdoor systems. Specific attributes of each system are shown to affect welfare, and systems that have similar attributes are affected similarly. For instance, environments in which hens are exposed to litter and soil, such as noncage and outdoor systems, provide a greater opportunity for disease and parasites. The more complex the environment, the more difficult it is to clean, and the larger the group size, the more easily disease and parasites are able to spread. Environments such as conventional cages, which limit movement, can lead to osteoporosis, but environments that have increased complexity, such as noncage systems, expose hens to an increased incidence of bone fractures. More space allows for hens to perform a greater repertoire of behaviors, although some deleterious behaviors such as cannibalism and piling, which results in smothering, can occur in large groups. Less is understood about the stress that each system imposes on the hen, but it appears that each system has its unique challenges. Selective breeding for desired traits such as improved bone strength and decreased feather pecking and cannibalism may help to improve welfare. It appears that no single housing system is ideal from a hen welfare perspective. Although environmental complexity increases behavioral opportunities, it also introduces difficulties in terms of disease and pest control. In addition, environmental complexity can create opportunities for the hens to express behaviors that may be detrimental to their welfare. As a result, any attempt to evaluate the sustainability of a switch to an alternative housing system requires careful consideration of the merits and shortcomings of each housing system
  • References (167)
  • Citations (187)
References167
Newest
#1Christine J Nicol (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 49
#2Gina Caplen (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 9
Last.William J. BrowneH-Index: 33
view all 4 authors...
#1G. B. Tactacan (UM: University of Manitoba)H-Index: 6
#2W. Guenter (UM: University of Manitoba)H-Index: 33
Last.James D. House (UM: University of Manitoba)H-Index: 28
view all 5 authors...
#1Krzysztof Flisikowski (TUM: Technische Universität München)H-Index: 17
#2Hermann Schwarzenbacher (TUM: Technische Universität München)H-Index: 13
Last.R. Fries (TUM: Technische Universität München)H-Index: 14
view all 7 authors...
Cited By187
Newest
#1Ida Thøfner (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 4
#2Louise Ladefoged Poulsen (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 4
Last.Jens Peter Christensen (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 24
view all 6 authors...
#1V. Večerek (VFU: University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno)H-Index: 15
#2Lenka Vecerkova (VFU: University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno)H-Index: 2
Last.Eva Voslarova (VFU: University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno)H-Index: 11
view all 3 authors...
#1S S MacLachlan (MSU: Michigan State University)
#2A B A Ali (Clemson University)
Last.Janice M. Siegford (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 15
view all 4 authors...
#1S L Weimer (UMD: University of Maryland, College Park)
#2C.I. Robison (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 5
Last.D. M. Karcher (Purdue University)H-Index: 12
view all 5 authors...
#1Lenka Vecerkova (VFU: University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno)H-Index: 2
#2V. Večerek (VFU: University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno)H-Index: 15
Last.Eva Voslarova (VFU: University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno)H-Index: 11
view all 3 authors...
#1Dan Ochs (MSU: Michigan State University)
#2Christopher A. Wolf (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 21
Last.John Lai (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
#1M Neijat (U of G: University of Guelph)H-Index: 2
#2Mohamed Neijat (U of G: University of Guelph)
Last.E. Kiarie (U of G: University of Guelph)H-Index: 15
view all 5 authors...
#1J. Y. Hu (Purdue University)H-Index: 4
#2P. Y. Hester (Purdue University)H-Index: 25
Last.H. W. Cheng (ARS: Agricultural Research Service)H-Index: 12
view all 6 authors...
View next paperComparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK