Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse

Published on May 1, 2005in Discourse Studies
· DOI :10.1177/1461445605050365
Ken Hyland60
Estimated H-index: 60
(Lond: University of London)
A great deal of research has now established that written texts embody interactions between writers and readers. A range of linguistic features have been identified as contributing to the writer's projection of a stance to the material referenced by the text, and, to a lesser extent, the strategies employed to presuppose the active role of an addressee. As yet, however, there is no overall typology of the resources writers employ to express their positions and connect with readers. Based on an analysis of 240 published research articles from eight disciplines and insider informant interviews, I attempt to address this gap and consolidate much of my earlier work to offer a framework for analysing the linguistic resources of intersubjective positioning. Attending to both stance and engagement, the model provides a comprehensive and integrated way of examining the means by which interaction is achieved in academic argument and how the discoursal preferences of disciplinary communities construct both writers ...
  • References (30)
  • Citations (497)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
441 Citations
1 Author (Ken Hyland)
482 Citations
177 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Geoff Thompson (University of Liverpool)H-Index: 13
#2Susan HunstonH-Index: 18
Evaluation is a central resource for meaning-making in text, but it is extremely complex. It is multifunctional and realized in ways whose systematicity is only beginning to be understood, and thus it defies easy identification and categorization. This article explores the different functions and surveys a range of approaches to the phenomenon, outlining the main features of each and illustrating their application in text analysis. The aim is to highlight both the common ground and the distincti...
164 CitationsSource
#1Ken Hyland (IOE: Institute of Education)H-Index: 60
#2Polly Tse (CUHK: The Chinese University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 12
The linguistic resources used by academic writers to adopt a position and engage with readers, variously described as evaluation, stance and metadiscourse, have attracted increasing attention in the literature over the last 10 years and now form an important element of many ESP courses. A relatively overlooked interpersonal feature, however, is what we shall call `evaluative that'. This is a structure which allows a writer to thematize attitudinal meanings and offer an explicit statement of eval...
148 CitationsSource
Metadiscourse is self-reflective linguistic material referring to the evolving text and to the writer and imagined reader of that text. It is based on a view of writing as social engagement and in academic contexts reveals the ways that writers project themselves into their discourse to signal their attitude towards both the propositional content and the audience of the text. Despite considerable interest in metadiscourse by teachers and applied linguists, however, it has failed to achieve its e...
439 CitationsSource
This article offers a framework for analysing the linguistic resources of intersubjective positioning, meanings which have elsewhere been treated under such headings as modality, polarity, evidentiality, hedging, concession, intensification, attribution and consequentiality. Drawing inspiration from Bakhtin/Volosinov's dialogic perspective, it proposes that this lexico-grammatically diverse grouping can be brought together on discourse semantic grounds, namely that they all provide the means for...
255 CitationsSource
#1Anna Mauranen (UTA: University of Tampere)H-Index: 26
#2Marina BondiH-Index: 9
37 CitationsSource
Successful academic writing involves both clear exposition and appropriate audience relationships, but the use of directives potentially undermines the harmony of such relationships. Because they instruct the reader to perform an action or to see things in a way determined by the writer, directives are potentially risky devices which are often regarded as bald-on-record threats to face (Brown and Levinson 1987). The widespread use of this feature in academic writing however suggests a more compl...
177 CitationsSource
Academic writing is governed by questioning. Papers are written with questions in mind or problems to solve, and occasionally these emerge as explicit interrogatives. But while they exploit the interactivity of more familiar conversational discourses, questions in academic writing perform rhetorical functions which differ considerably from them. In this article I explore the distribution and use of questions through an analysis of a 1.8-million-word corpus of research articles, textbooks and L2 ...
85 CitationsSource
#1Ken Hyland (CityU: City University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 60
Much of the literature concerning participant relationships in academic writing has discussed features that project the stance, identity, or credibility of the writer, rather than examining how writers engage with readers. In contrast, this article focuses on strategies that presuppose the active role of addressees, examining six key ways that writers seek explicitly to establish the presence of their readers in the discourse. Based on an analysis of 240 published research articles from eight di...
183 CitationsSource
#1Geoff Thompson (University of Liverpool)H-Index: 13
The view of written texts as embodying interaction between the writer and reader is now well established, and underlies many aspects that may be focused on in the training of novice writers of academic text. In this paper, I argue that interaction can draw on both interactive and interactional resources: interactive resources help to guide the reader through the text, while interactional resources involve the reader collaboratively in the development of the text. I use the concept of the 'reader...
246 CitationsSource
One of the most agreeable aspects of being reviews editor for English for Specific Purposes is that occasionally an extremely interesting book turns up unsolicited in the mail box: Marina Bondi’s volume on genre variation in Economics is a good example of this. Using insights from systemic linguistics and rhetorical analysis, English across Genres shows how small-scale corpora can contribute to our understanding of the ways writers vary their use of language to construct effective arguments in d...
30 CitationsSource
Cited By497
#1William Wai Lam Lee (HKUST: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)
Abstract This study explores hedging and boosting as impression management strategies in the discourse of Chinese and U.S. corporations. The analysis has been conducted on the CEO's letter to shareholders of 100 Chinese and 100 U.S. corporations to reveal pronounced variations in the frequencies and pattern of use in the two resources. First, substantially more hedges and boosters are used in the U.S. discourse in comparison to the Chinese, thus, demonstrating a greater effort invested in persua...
#1Kaisa Koskinen (UTA: University of Tampere)H-Index: 10
In an age of AI and automated translation, the affective remains a decisively human condition. Translation and Affect is a collection of essays that investigate the role of affects and emotions across the spectrum of translatorial activities and areas, from public service interpreting to multilingual poetry recitals, from translator training to translation technology. In an effort at creating a consilient approach that bridges different research traditions in Translation Studies, Koskinen uses a...
#1Rosa Lorés (FFyL: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras)H-Index: 4
Abstract Digital discourse in scholarly and scientific communication has lately become a main object of study in discourse analysis, linguistics and associated fields. The increasing demands placed on scientists to disseminate and gain visibility for their research and on institutions to account for expenditure on research and innovation, in combination with a myriad of technical affordances, are enhancing the appearance of diverse digital practices, as a way to respond to an ever-changing and i...
#1Bindi Bennett (University of the Sunshine Coast)H-Index: 7
This article provides a content analysis of articles published in Australian Social Work, the British Journal of Social Work, the International Journal of Social Welfare and International Social Wo...
#1Brian Paltridge (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 19
Abstract This paper examines the use of engagement strategies in reviewers’ reports on submissions to academic journals. The data examined are reviewers’ reports on submissions to the journal English for Specific Purposes. The study found that the reviewers used directives as their main engagement strategy. These directives, however, were often indirect or hedged, making it difficult for writers who are new to the peer review process to know how to respond to them. A further engagement strategy ...
#1Ruth Breeze (University of Navarra)H-Index: 7
#1Carolina Viera (BSU: Boise State University)
Text analysis informed by Genre Theory (Hyon 1996) and methods in Corpus Linguistics provide the opportunity to describe language patterns that exist not only at the individual level but also in discourse communities. In this study, we investigate the discourse strategies used by novice and expert members of the academic United States (US) Spanishspeaking community to engage their audience, construct interpersonal meaning, and position themselves as expert speakers. We analyze two corpora: a spe...
#1Zahra Loghmani (FUM: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)H-Index: 2
#2Behzad Ghonsooly (FUM: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)H-Index: 8
Last. Mohammad Ghazanfari (FUM: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)H-Index: 6
view all 3 authors...
Abstract Academic writing is seen as an attempt to involve interaction between writers and readers; hence, academics are required to not only produce texts representing external realities but also use language to recognize, build and exchange social relations. The present study was conducted to analyze how native English speaker, Ph.D. students in the field of TEFL position their texts intertextually when writing their doctoral dissertations’ discussion sections. To this end, ten discussion sect...