Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse

Published on May 1, 2005in Scandinavian Journal of Public Health1.76
· DOI :10.1177/1461445605050365
Ken Hyland59
Estimated H-index: 59
(Lond: University of London)
A great deal of research has now established that written texts embody interactions between writers and readers. A range of linguistic features have been identified as contributing to the writer's projection of a stance to the material referenced by the text, and, to a lesser extent, the strategies employed to presuppose the active role of an addressee. As yet, however, there is no overall typology of the resources writers employ to express their positions and connect with readers. Based on an analysis of 240 published research articles from eight disciplines and insider informant interviews, I attempt to address this gap and consolidate much of my earlier work to offer a framework for analysing the linguistic resources of intersubjective positioning. Attending to both stance and engagement, the model provides a comprehensive and integrated way of examining the means by which interaction is achieved in academic argument and how the discoursal preferences of disciplinary communities construct both writers ...
  • References (30)
  • Citations (497)
#1Geoff Thompson (University of Liverpool)H-Index: 10
#2Susan HunstonH-Index: 18
#1Ken Hyland (IOE: Institute of Education)H-Index: 59
#2Polly Tse (CUHK: The Chinese University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 12
Cited By497
#1Shahin Moghaddasi (U of A: University of Alberta)H-Index: 2
#2Heather Graves (U of A: University of Alberta)H-Index: 4
Last.Xavier Gutierrez (U of A: University of Alberta)H-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
#1Lifen Shen (University of Auckland)H-Index: 1
#2Susan Carter (University of Auckland)H-Index: 13
Last.Jun Lawrence Zhang (Xi'an Jiaotong University)H-Index: 17
view all 3 authors...
View next paperMetadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing