Review paper
A comparison of simulated annealing cooling strategies
Volume: 31, Issue: 41, Pages: 8373 - 8385
Published: Oct 16, 1998
Abstract
Using computer experiments on a simple three-state system and an NP-complete system of permanents we compare different proposed simulated annealing schedules in order to find the cooling strategy which has the least total entropy production during the annealing process for given initial and final states and fixed number of iterations. The schedules considered are constant thermodynamic speed, exponential, logarithmic, and linear cooling...
Figures & Tables
Figure 1. The simple three-state system.
Figure 2. The entropy production rate and the total accumulated entropy producti...
Figure 3. The entropy production rate and the total accumulated entropy producti...
Figure 4. The entropy production rate and total accumulated entropy production f...
Figure 5. The entropy production rate and total accumulated entropy production f...
Figure 6. The BSFE as the annealing progresses for the permanent system using 15...
Figure 7. The relaxation time for the permanent system computed in two different...
Paper Details
Title
A comparison of simulated annealing cooling strategies
Published Date
Oct 16, 1998
Volume
31
Issue
41
Pages
8373 - 8385
TrendsPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand a paper’s academic impact over time?
- Scinapse’s Citation Trends graph enables the impact assessment of papers in adjacent fields.
- Assess paper quality within the same journal or volume, irrespective of the year or field, and track the changes in the attention a paper received over time.
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.