Academic and Emotional Functioning in Middle School: The Role of Implicit Theories

Published on Jan 1, 2014in Emotion3.13
· DOI :10.1037/a0035490
Carissa Romero5
Estimated H-index: 5
(Stanford University),
Allison Master12
Estimated H-index: 12
(UW: University of Washington)
+ 2 AuthorsLisa Feldman Barrett L F138
Estimated H-index: 138
(Stanford University)
Adolescents face many academic and emotional challenges in middle school, but notable differences are evident in how well they adapt. What predicts adolescents’ academic and emotional outcomes during this period? One important factor might be adolescents’ implicit theories about whether intelligence and emotions can change. The current study examines how these theories affect academic and emotional outcomes. One hundred fifteen students completed surveys throughout middle school, and their grades and course selections were obtained from school records. Students who believed that intelligence could be developed earned higher grades and were more likely to move to advanced math courses over time. Students who believed that emotions could be controlled reported fewer depressive symptoms and, if they began middle school with lower well-being, were more likely to feel better over time. These findings illustrate the power of adolescents’ implicit theories, suggesting exciting new pathways for intervention.
Figures & Tables
  • References (55)
  • Citations (100)
#1David S. Yeager (University of Texas at Austin)H-Index: 24
#2Kali H. Trzesniewski (UC Davis: University of California, Davis)H-Index: 34
Last.Carol S. Dweck (Stanford University)H-Index: 80
view all 3 authors...
#1Meike Bartels (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 45
#2Dorret I. Boomsma (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 136
#1Jacquelynne S. Eccles (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 112
#2Robert W. Roeser (PSU: Portland State University)H-Index: 35
#1R.H. Baayen (U of A: University of Alberta)H-Index: 1
#2D.J. Davidson (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 1
Last.Douglas M. Bates (UW: University of Wisconsin-Madison)H-Index: 32
view all 3 authors...
#1B. J. Casey (Cornell University)H-Index: 88
#2Rebecca M. Jones (Cornell University)H-Index: 23
Last.Todd A. Hare (California Institute of Technology)H-Index: 34
view all 3 authors...
#1Motoko Akiba (MU: University of Missouri)H-Index: 17
#2Gerald K. LeTendre (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 16
Last.Jay Paredes Scribner (MU: University of Missouri)H-Index: 14
view all 3 authors...
#1Maya Tamir (BC: Boston College)H-Index: 32
#2Oliver P. John (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 73
Last.Lisa Feldman Barrett L F (Stanford University)H-Index: 138
view all 4 authors...
Cited By100
#1Tracy A. Prout (Yeshiva University)H-Index: 2
#2Anthea Malone (Yeshiva University)
Last.Leon Hoffman (New York Psychoanalytic Society)H-Index: 7
view all 4 authors...
#1Huy P. Phan (UNE: University of New England (Australia))H-Index: 13
#2Bing H. Ngu (UNE: University of New England (Australia))H-Index: 8
Last.Sheng-Ying Shi (Huafan University)H-Index: 1
view all 6 authors...
#1Jessica L. Schleider (SBU: Stony Brook University)H-Index: 12
#2Michael C Mullarkey (University of Texas at Austin)H-Index: 4
Last.Anil Chacko (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 24
view all 3 authors...
#1Maria El-Abd (Lebanese International University)
#2Carolyn M. Callahan (UVA: University of Virginia)H-Index: 25
Last.Amy Price Azano (VT: Virginia Tech)H-Index: 7
view all 3 authors...
View next paperSelf-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development