Distinguishing Drift and Selection Empirically: “The Great Snail Debate” of the 1950s

Volume: 41, Issue: 2, Pages: 339 - 367
Published: Oct 19, 2007
Abstract
Biologists and philosophers have been extremely pessimistic about the possibility of demonstrating random drift in nature, particularly when it comes to distinguishing random drift from natural selection. However, examination of a historical case – Maxime Lamotte’s study of natural populations of the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis in the 1950s – shows that while some pessimism is warranted, it has been overstated. Indeed, by describing a unique...
Paper Details
Title
Distinguishing Drift and Selection Empirically: “The Great Snail Debate” of the 1950s
Published Date
Oct 19, 2007
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
339 - 367
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.