Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.
Abstract
Context Many journals give authors who submit papers the opportunity to suggest reviewers. Use of these reviewers varies by journal and little is known about the quality of the reviews they produce. Objective To compare author- and editor-suggested reviewers to investigate differences in review quality and recommendations for publication. Design, Setting, and Participants Observational study of original research papers sent for external review...
Paper Details
Title
Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.
Published Date
Jan 18, 2006
Journal
Volume
295
Issue
3
Pages
314 - 317
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History