Branding/Logomark minus Citation Combined Shape Icon/Bookmark-empty Icon/Copy Icon/Collection Icon/Close Copy 7 no author result Created with Sketch. Icon/Back Created with Sketch.
Loading Scinapse...
Ranking the research productivity of business and management institutions in Asia---Pacific region: empirical research in leading ABS journals
Published on Nov 1, 2015in Scientometrics 2.17
· DOI :10.1007/s11192-015-1752-x
Dengsheng Wu9
Estimated H-index: 9
(Chinese Academy of Sciences),
Minglu Li6
Estimated H-index: 6
(National Natural Science Foundation of China)
+ 2 AuthorsJianping Li19
Estimated H-index: 19
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Abstract
Ranking research productivity of institutions periodically is of a great necessity nowadays, for that can not only help understand the latest development level of related fields but also contribute to finding gaps and quickly improve. In previous studies, the number of publications and further impact factors of journals is two widely used indexes to measure research productivity. However, impact factors do not always tally with a quality of the journal, which will lead to a bias of research productivity. Given this, a new journal rating adjusted publications (JRAP) index is constructed in this paper, which is based on the journal rating of the ABS journal guide. It takes the quantity of publications and the quality of the publications into account at the same time. Compared with impact factors, academic journal guide can provide more authoritative and accurate measurement to the quality of journals. Experiments are conducted to rank Asia---Pacific institutions in business and management area based on JRAP, and it is the first time to rank Asia---Pacific institutions systematically. Ranking of institutions measured by three methods is also given. Compared the results obtained by three different rank methods, although institutions ranked in the top places keep the same, the specific rank differs. The results indicate that JRAP do prefer the institutions perform well in paper quantity and quality of journals.
  • References (29)
  • Cited By (10)
Cite
References29
Published on Apr 1, 2004in Management International Review 2.28
Vikas Kumar27
Estimated H-index: 27
,
Sumit K. Kundu23
Estimated H-index: 23
Abstract * This study measures and ranks the productivity of academic institutions based on their number of publications from 1991 to 2000, in the top 3 core international business journals. * This study serves as a useful update of the previous studies by Morrison and Inkpen (1991) and Inkpen and Beamish (1994) examining three core international business journals namely, Management International Review, Journal of International Business Studies, and Journal of World Business. An attempt has bee...
51 Citations
Published on Mar 1, 2011in Management Information Systems Quarterly 5.43
Douglas L. Dean16
Estimated H-index: 16
(Brigham Young University),
Paul Benjamin Lowry33
Estimated H-index: 33
(Brigham Young University),
Sean L. Humpherys5
Estimated H-index: 5
(University of Arizona)
How many articles in highly rated journals do Information Systems research faculty publish to earn tenure? Which journals are highly rated outlets? Tenure candidates, promotion and tenure committees, and those who are asked to write external letters are frequently called upon to answer such questions. When Dennis et al. (2006) examined all IS Ph.D. graduates entering academic careers, few faculty had published enough articles in 20 "elite" journals in six years to meet tenure research expectatio...
57 Citations Source Cite
Published on Jan 1, 2012in Accounting and Finance 1.54
Kam C. Chan20
Estimated H-index: 20
(Western Kentucky University),
Chih-Hsiang Chang9
Estimated H-index: 9
(National University of Kaohsiung)
+ 1 AuthorsFeida Zhang5
Estimated H-index: 5
(Sun Yat-sen University)
We assess the research productivity of the accounting and finance community in Australian and New Zealand higher education institutions (HEIs) during 1991–2010 using 48 high-quality accounting and finance journals. Our finding suggests that the HEIs’ research output steadily increases during the 20-year period. The University of New South Wales, the University of Sydney, Monash University, the University of Melbourne and the University of Queensland are the top-five HEIs. We also find that it is...
12 Citations Source Cite
Published on Feb 1, 2002in Scientometrics 2.17
María Bordons25
Estimated H-index: 25
(Spanish National Research Council),
María Teresa Hernández Fernández9
Estimated H-index: 9
(Spanish National Research Council),
Isabel Mateo Gómez18
Estimated H-index: 18
(Spanish National Research Council)
Impact factor is a quasi-qualitative indicator, which provides a measurement of the prestige and international visibility of journals. Although the use of impact factor-based indicators for science policy purposes has increased over the last two decades, several limitations have been pointed out and should be borne in mind. The use of impact factor should be treated carefully when applied to the analysis of peripheral countries, whose national journals are hardly covered by ISI databases. Our ex...
203 Citations Source Cite
Published on Aug 1, 2006in International Business Review 2.75
Kam C. Chan22
Estimated H-index: 22
(Western Kentucky University),
Hung-Gay Fung26
Estimated H-index: 26
(University of Missouri–St. Louis),
Wai K. Leung11
Estimated H-index: 11
(The Chinese University of Hong Kong)
Using 10 years of publication data (1995-2004) from four leading international business journals, we examine global patterns of international business research and school rankings. Although US institutions still lead in the international business research, non-US schools are making significant progress. Asian-Pacific and European schools are well represented among the schools that account for the most articles appearing in the four journals. International collaboration between scholars across th...
59 Citations Source Cite
Som D. Jarwal1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Monash University),
Andrew M. Brion1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Monash University),
Maxwell L. King26
Estimated H-index: 26
(Monash University)
This paper examines whether three bibliometric indicators—the journal impact factor, citations per paper and the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) initiative's list of ‘ranked journals’—can predict the quality of individual research articles as assessed by international experts, both overall and within broad disciplinary groupings. The analysis is based on data obtained from a Mock Research Quality Framework (RQF) exercise conducted by Monash University during 2006–07 in which external ...
37 Citations Source Cite
Kam C. Chan20
Estimated H-index: 20
(Western Kentucky University),
Carl R. Chen26
Estimated H-index: 26
(University of Dayton),
Peter P. Lung9
Estimated H-index: 9
(University of Dayton)
We provide a ranking of world finance research output by countries and institutions. Based upon 21 finance journals, the top five most productive countries are in the following order: U.S., U.K., Canada, Hong Kong, and Australia. We find that higher per capita GNP, English-speaking countries, and a capital market that offers her investors more protections are associated with higher level of finance literature production. New York University, the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, th...
27 Citations Source Cite
Published on Aug 1, 2009in International Journal of Production Economics 4.41
Pao-Nuan Hsieh2
Estimated H-index: 2
(National Taiwan University),
Pao-Long Chang11
Estimated H-index: 11
(Feng Chia University)
Journal publications are important to facilitate knowledge sharing among production and operations management (POM) academics and practitioners. The purpose of this study was to explore the global POM research performance based on papers published in 20 core POM journals in the past half century. The data for the study were obtained from Thomson Reuters' Web of Science/Knowledge databases, from 1959 to 2008, when 63,776 papers were published in POM journals. The annual distribution of papers pub...
44 Citations Source Cite
Published on Dec 1, 2010in China Economic Review 1.80
Xiaohua Yu16
Estimated H-index: 16
(University of Göttingen),
Zhifeng Gao13
Estimated H-index: 13
(University of Florida)
This paper ranks the economic research institutions in China based on publications in the SSCI economics journals from 2000 through 2009 and finds that the gap in the research capacity of economic research institutions between the mainland and Hong Kong is very large, even though the difference in overall quality is not so significant. This paper can reflect successes and failures of the reform of the economics education in China over the past decade and give important implications for the ongoi...
7 Citations Source Cite
Published on Mar 1, 2015in Information Processing and Management 3.44
Fang Xu4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Chinese Academy of Sciences),
Wenbin Liu29
Estimated H-index: 29
(University of Kent),
John Mingers51
Estimated H-index: 51
(University of Kent)
Abstract In this work we develop new journal classification methods based on the h-index. The introduction of the h-index for research evaluation has attracted much attention in the bibliometric study and research quality evaluation. The main purpose of using an h-index is to compare the index for different research units (e.g. researchers, journals, etc.) to differentiate their research performance. However the h-index is defined by only comparing citations counts of one’s own publications, it ...
8 Citations Source Cite
Cited By10
Published on Dec 1, 2016in Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research 0.56
Dengsheng Wu9
Estimated H-index: 9
,
Yongjia Xie4
Estimated H-index: 4
+ 1 AuthorsJianping Li19
Estimated H-index: 19
Scholars from Mainland China have published 8541 papers in 79 Operations Research and Management Science (OR/MS) journals available on the ISI Web of Science (WOS). Data from 2001 to 2013 constitute the basis of the bibliometric method used in this paper for statistical analysis of status of OR/MS research in Mainland China, from the perspectives of number of papers, quality of papers, most productive institutions, co-author analysis, citations analysis and research topic analysis, etc. The resu...
4 Citations Source Cite
Published on Jan 3, 2017in Baltic Journal of Management 1.15
Vladimír Bureš7
Estimated H-index: 7
Purpose Research focussed on various issues or perspectives of business can be considered as an important driving force for business development. The purpose of this paper is to identify the main topics and trends associated with business-related research conducted in Belarus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia, Slovakia and Ukraine. The study results contribute to a context-aware explanation of the dynamics of business-oriented research in individual countri...
1 Citations Source Cite
Published on Mar 1, 2017in Annals of Data Science
Yongjia Xie2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Chinese Academy of Sciences),
Dengsheng Wu9
Estimated H-index: 9
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
+ 2 AuthorsJianping Li19
Estimated H-index: 19
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
It has been worthy of notice that the number of scientific researchers has experienced a rapid growth in China. Meanwhile, the strict restriction to the total number and the position structure of researchers has exerted great pressure on the Chinese researchers. The decision makers have noticed this dilemma and a quantitative predicting result for decision support is in need. This paper puts forward a data-driven dynamic programming model to estimate the research position demand gap based on the...
Source Cite
Published on Apr 1, 2017in Scientometrics 2.17
Dejian Yu11
Estimated H-index: 11
(Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics),
Wanru Wang2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics)
+ 2 AuthorsRongyu Liu2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics)
Important journals usually guide the research and development directions in academic circles. Therefore, it is necessary to find the important journals among a number of academic journals. This study presents a model named the multiple-link, mutually reinforced journal-ranking (MLMRJR) model based on the PageRank and the Hyperlink-Induced Topics Search algorithms that considers not only the quantity and quality of citations in intra-networks, but also the mutual reinforcement in inter-networks. ...
8 Citations Source Cite
Published on Sep 1, 2017in Information Processing and Management 3.44
Jing Li1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Chinese Academy of Sciences),
Dengsheng Wu9
Estimated H-index: 9
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
+ 1 AuthorsMinglu Li6
Estimated H-index: 6
(National Natural Science Foundation of China)
Abstract Periodically ranking institutional research productivity is necessary not only to understand the status of the development of related fields but also to identify gaps and take appropriate corrective steps. Many bibliometric indicators contribute to the assessment of institutional research productivity, but the appropriateness of the indicator and the relationships between different indicators are topics that have not been addressed. For this reason, an indicator framework for the rankin...
7 Citations Source Cite
Published on Jan 1, 2017in Procedia Computer Science
Xiaoli Lu (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Cuifeng Ma
Abstract As a new type of potential energy, methane hydrate presents a very high resource value, has been a long-term research focus in oil and gas industry. Based on the Web of Science database, this paper analyzes the research collaboration of international methane hydrate. The paper gives a framework for collaboration network of methane hydrate research. Based on the 7194 collected papers during 2001-2016, the paper calculates the cooperation rate and cooperation degree of methane hydrate res...
Source Cite
Published on Jan 1, 2017in Procedia Computer Science
Jing Li2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Anhui University),
Shuai Zhang1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Anhui University)
+ 1 AuthorsYunzhi Wang1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Wuhan University)
Abstract In this study, researchers do interviews with 18 samples who are selected as the semi-structured interview object, and then we use the qualitative analysis software, NVivo 11, to qualitatively analyze the original data of the interview. In the end, we get six main influencing factors of the user’s online knowledge consumption behavior, namely, perceived information quality, task-driven, subjective norms, perceived value, perceived price, free values. The perceived information quality is...
2 Citations Source Cite
Published on Jul 1, 2018in Scientometrics 2.17
Lili Yuan1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Chinese Academy of Sciences),
Yanni Hao1
Estimated H-index: 1
(National Natural Science Foundation of China)
+ 3 AuthorsDengsheng Wu9
Estimated H-index: 9
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
International research collaboration is vital to the success of scientific development of China, and the identification of collaboration partners is the basic unit of collaboration. While many researchers have investigated international research collaboration using publication data, grant data have rarely been used. This paper explores the international research collaboration partners of China from a new data perspective, based on grant data. Using data from the National Natural Science Foundati...
1 Citations Source Cite
Published on May 1, 2018in Journal of Informetrics 3.48
Dengsheng Wu9
Estimated H-index: 9
(Chinese Academy of Sciences),
Jing Li1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Anhui University)
+ 1 AuthorsJianping Li19
Estimated H-index: 19
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Abstract Assessing the scholarly impact of academic institutions has become increasingly important. The achievements of editorial board members can create benchmarks for research excellence and can be used to evaluate both individual and institutional performance. This paper proposes a new method based on journal editor data for assessing an institution’s scholarly impact. In this paper, a journal editorship index (JEI) that simultaneously accounts for the journal rating (JR), editor title (ET),...
1 Citations Source Cite
View next paperRanking Journals by Concentration of Author Affiliation: Thirty-Five Years of Finance Research