Trajectories of change in students’ self-concepts of ability and values in math and college major choice

Published on May 19, 2015in Educational Research and Evaluation
· DOI :10.1080/13803611.2015.1057161
Lauren E. Musu-Gillette3
Estimated H-index: 3
(UMD: University of Maryland, College Park),
Allan Wigfield60
Estimated H-index: 60
(UMD: University of Maryland, College Park)
+ 1 AuthorsJacquelynne S. Eccles107
Estimated H-index: 107
(UCI: University of California, Irvine)
This study extends previous research on the long-term connections between motivation constructs in expectancy-value theory and achievement outcomes. Using growth mixture modelling, we examined trajectories of change for 421 students from 4th grade through college in their self-concept of ability (SCA) in math, interest in math, and perceived importance of math. We also assessed how these trajectories relate to choice of college major, focusing on math-intensive and non-intensive majors. Gender, parental income, and initial achievement were included as covariates in the analyses. A 3-class solution best represented underlying trajectories of change for each of the 3 constructs. A latent class relatively high in math self-concept, interest, and importance emerged for each construct respectively, and individuals in these high classes were most likely to choose a math-intensive college major. Interpretations and implications of the trajectories of change and their influence on college major classification are...
  • References (49)
  • Citations (40)
#1Allan Wigfield (UMD: University of Maryland, College Park)H-Index: 60
#2Jacquelynne S. Eccles (UCI: University of California, Irvine)H-Index: 107
Last.Ulrich Schiefele (University of Potsdam)H-Index: 33
view all 6 authors...
#1Adele Eskeles Gottfried (CSUN: California State University, Northridge)H-Index: 23
#2George A. Marcoulides (UCR: University of California, Riverside)H-Index: 34
Last.Pamella H. Oliver (CSUF: California State University, Fullerton)H-Index: 20
view all 4 authors...
#1Lisa M. Larson (Iowa State University)H-Index: 24
#2Tsui Feng Wu (Iowa State University)H-Index: 1
Last.Fred H. Borgen (Iowa State University)H-Index: 30
view all 6 authors...
#1Anne C. Frenzel (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 23
#2Thomas Goetz (University of Konstanz)H-Index: 29
Last.Helen Margaret Gilchrist Watt (Monash University)H-Index: 24
view all 4 authors...
#1Lisa M. Larson (Iowa State University)H-Index: 24
#2Tsui-Feng Wu (Iowa State University)H-Index: 8
Last.Courtney E. Gasser (UB: University of Baltimore)H-Index: 2
view all 5 authors...
#1Isabelle Archambault (UdeM: Université de Montréal)H-Index: 11
#2Jacquelynne S. Eccles (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 107
Last.Mina Vida (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 6
view all 3 authors...
#1Hanno Petras (UMD: University of Maryland, College Park)H-Index: 20
#2Katherine E. Masyn (UC Davis: University of California, Davis)H-Index: 23
Cited By40
#1Jill DennerH-Index: 15
#2Olivia M. Valdes (FAU: Florida Atlantic University)H-Index: 1
Last.Brett Laursen (FAU: Florida Atlantic University)H-Index: 45
view all 4 authors...
#1Ming-Te Wang (University of Pittsburgh)H-Index: 27
#2Jiesi Guo (ACU: Australian Catholic University)
Last.Jessica L. Degol (Penn State Altoona)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
#1Shari R. Metzger (UMBC: University of Maryland, Baltimore County)H-Index: 2
#2Susan Sonnenschein (UMBC: University of Maryland, Baltimore County)H-Index: 17
Last.Claudia Galindo (UMD: University of Maryland, College Park)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
#1Jeffrey C. Shih (UNLV: University of Nevada, Las Vegas)H-Index: 3
#2Marsha Ing (UCR: University of California, Riverside)H-Index: 12
Last.Cathrine Maiorca (LBSU: California State University, Long Beach)H-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
#1Sarah E. McKellar (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 2
#2Aixa D. Marchand (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 2
Last.Jacquelynne S. Eccles (UCI: University of California, Irvine)H-Index: 107
view all 5 authors...
View next paperMath and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs.