Match!

Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy

Published on May 1, 1992in Surgery3.476
P.-A. Clavien97
Estimated H-index: 97
,
Sanabria1
Estimated H-index: 1
,
Steven M. Strasberg32
Estimated H-index: 32
Abstract
Abstract Lack of uniform reporting of negative outcomes makes interpretation of surgical literature difficult. We attempt to define and classify negative outcomes by differentiating complications, sequelae, and failures. Complications and sequelae result from procedures, adding new problems to the underlying disease. However, complications are unexpected events not intrinsic to the procedure, whereas sequelae are inherent to the procedure. Failures are events in which the purpose of the procedure is not fulfilled. We propose a classification of complications based on four grades: Grade I complications are alterations from the ideal postoperative course, non-life-threatening, and with no lasting disability. Complications of this grade necessitate only bedside procedures and do not significantly extend hospital stay. Grade II complications are potentially life-threatening but without residual disability. Within grade II complications a subdivision is made according to the requirement for invasive procedures. Grade III complications are those with residual disability, including organ resection or persistence of life-threatening conditions. Finally, grade IV complications are deaths as a result of complications. To illustrate the relevance of the classification, we reviewed 650 cases of elective cholecystectomy. Risk factors for development of complications were determined, and the classification was also used to analyze the value of a modified APACHE II as a preoperative prognostic score. Both supported the relevance of the proposed classification. The advantages of such a classification are (1) increased uniformity in reporting results, (2) the ability to compare results of two distinct time periods in a single center, (3) the ability to compare results of surgery between different centers, (4) the ability to compare results of surgical versus nonsurgical measures, (5) the ability to perform adequate metaanalysis, (6) the ability to identify objective preoperative risk factors, and (7) the ability to establish preoperative prognostic scores.
  • References (0)
  • Citations (935)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
333 Citations
259 Citations
437 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References0
Newest
Cited By935
Newest
#1JC Chen (The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center)
#2Eliza W. Beal (The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center)H-Index: 10
Last. Jordan M. Cloyd (The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center)H-Index: 9
view all 6 authors...
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is indicated for patients with peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal cancer. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before CRS-HIPEC remains controversial. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult patients who underwent CRS +/- HIPEC for metastatic appendiceal cancer between 2000-2017 was performed. Patients who received NAC followed by surgery were compared with those who underwent su...
Source
#1Peter B. DermanH-Index: 11
#2Jakub Sikora-Klak (UCSD: University of California, San Diego)H-Index: 4
Last. Richard D. GuyerH-Index: 36
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Mazda Farshad (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 17
#2Alexander Aichmair (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 12
Last. David E. Bauer (UZH: University of Zurich)H-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
Abstract BACKGROUND CONTEXT Perioperative complications affect surgical outcomes. Classification systems of perioperative complications are well established and widely applied in many surgical fields other than spine surgery. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to construct and validate a comprehensive classification system for perioperative complications in spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case series METHODS A comprehensive classification system was constructed to stratify complications...
Source
#1Koichi Morisaki (Kyushu University)H-Index: 7
#2Tadashi Furuyama (Kyushu University)H-Index: 10
Last. Masaki Mori (Kyushu University)H-Index: 88
view all 10 authors...
ObjectiveThis study was performed to determine whether thigh sarcopenia can serve as a clinically relevant predictor of postoperative complications and overall survival after revascularization in p...
Source
Source
#1Harissou AdamouH-Index: 1
Last. R SaniH-Index: 4
view all 8 authors...
Background: Perioperative management in digestive surgery is a challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. Objective: To describe the process and outcomes of perioperative management in gastrointestinal surgery. Materials and methods: This was a single center cross-sectional study over a 4-month period from June 1 to September 30, 2017, in a Nigerien hospital (West Africa). This study included caregivers and patients operated on gastrointestinal surgery. Results: We collected data for 56 caregivers and 253...
Source
#1A. K. E. ElfrinkH-Index: 1
#2Niels F. M. KokH-Index: 5
Last. Rutger-Jan SwijnenburgH-Index: 17
view all 39 authors...
INTRODUCTION: Definitions regarding resectability and hence indications for preoperative chemotherapy vary. Use of preoperative chemotherapy may influence postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to assess the variation in use of preoperative chemotherapy for CRLM and related postoperative outcomes in the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2018 were included from a national database. Case-mix factors contrib...
1 CitationsSource
#1Masaki WakasugiH-Index: 9
#2Junzo ShimizuH-Index: 17
Last. Mitsuyoshi TeiH-Index: 6
view all 12 authors...
Abstract Introduction Whether prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is necessary remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after LLR. Methods A retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients who underwent LLR at Osaka Rosai Hospital from April 2011 to November 2018 was performed. During this period, prophylactic abdominal drainage was routinely omitted during LLR without biliary anastomosis. The pri...
Source
#1Christina Fleming (University Hospital Limerick)H-Index: 1
#1Christina Fleming (University Hospital Limerick)H-Index: 1
Last. Mazen El Bassiouni (University Hospital Limerick)H-Index: 1
view all 13 authors...
Robotic-assisted surgery is evolving, with improving clinical and cancer outcomes. The aim of this study was to present the clinical and cancer outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RAS-CR) at University Hospital Limerick (UHL) since its introduction to the 100th case, using the daVinci Xi dual-console surgical system. The RAS-CR programme at UHL commenced in June 2016 and the 100th case was performed in July 2019. All patient-related data were recorded prospective...
Source
#1Robert Dotzauer (University of Mainz)H-Index: 2
#2A. La Torre (University of Mainz)
Last. Thomas Höfner (University of Mainz)H-Index: 1
view all 13 authors...
PURPOSE: Open simple prostatectomy (OSP) is a standard surgical technique for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostate size larger than 80 ml. As a minimally invasive approach, robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) emerged as a feasible surgical alternative. Currently, there are no definite recommendations for the standard use of RASP. Therefore, we aimed at investigating various clinical outcomes comparing RASP with OSP. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, w...
Source