Match!

ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship?

Published on May 1, 2015in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology2.738
· DOI :10.1002/asi.23236
Mike Thelwall67
Estimated H-index: 67
(University of Wolverhampton),
Kayvan Kousha24
Estimated H-index: 24
(University of Wolverhampton)
Sources
Abstract
ResearchGate is a social network site for academics to create their own profiles, list their publications, and interact with each other. Like Academia.edu, it provides a new way for scholars to disseminate their work and hence potentially changes the dynamics of informal scholarly communication. This article assesses whether ResearchGate usage and publication data broadly reflect existing academic hierarchies and whether individual countries are set to benefit or lose out from the site. The results show that rankings based on ResearchGate statistics correlate moderately well with other rankings of academic institutions, suggesting that ResearchGate use broadly reflects the traditional distribution of academic capital. Moreover, while Brazil, India, and some other countries seem to be disproportionately taking advantage of ResearchGate, academics in China, South Korea, and Russia may be missing opportunities to use ResearchGate to maximize the academic impact of their publications.
Figures & Tables
  • References (40)
  • Citations (141)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2014
117 Citations
201443.07Nature
250 Citations
48 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References40
Newest
#1Stefanie Haustein (UdeM: Université de Montréal)H-Index: 22
#2Isabella Peters (German National Library of Economics)H-Index: 17
Last. Jens Terliesner (HHU: University of Düsseldorf)H-Index: 5
view all 6 authors...
Altmetrics, indices based on social media platforms and tools, have recently emerged as alternative means of measuring scholarly impact. Such indices assume that scholars in fact populate online social environments, and interact with scholarly products in the social web. We tested this assumption by examining the use and coverage of social media environments amongst a sample of bibliometricians examining both their own use of online platforms and the use of their papers on social reference manag...
137 CitationsSource
#1Pardeep Sud (University of Wolverhampton)H-Index: 11
#2Mike Thelwall (University of Wolverhampton)H-Index: 4
The rise of the social web and its uptake by scholars has led to the creation of altmetrics, which are social web metrics for academic publications. These new metrics can, in theory, be used in an evaluative role, to give early estimates of the impact of publications or to give estimates of non-traditional types of impact. They can also be used as an information seeking aid: to help draw a digital library user's attention to papers that have attracted social web mentions. If altmetrics are to be...
111 CitationsSource
#1Amalia Mas-Bleda (CSIC: Spanish National Research Council)H-Index: 4
#2Mike Thelwall (University of Wolverhampton)H-Index: 67
Last. Isidro F. Aguillo Caño (CSIC: Spanish National Research Council)H-Index: 20
view all 4 authors...
Purpose – This study aims to explore the link creating behaviour of European highly cited scientists based upon their online lists of publications and their institutional personal websites. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 1,525 highly cited scientists working at European institutions were first identified. Outlinks from their online lists of publications and their personal websites pointing to a pre-defined collection of popular academic websites and file types were then gathered by a p...
15 CitationsSource
#1Heidi G. Allen (NeuRA: Neuroscience Research Australia)H-Index: 2
#2Tasha R. Stanton (NeuRA: Neuroscience Research Australia)H-Index: 26
Last. G. Lorimer Moseley (NeuRA: Neuroscience Research Australia)H-Index: 59
view all 4 authors...
A barrier to dissemination of research is that it depends on the end-user searching for or ‘pulling’ relevant knowledge from the literature base. Social media instead ‘pushes’ relevant knowledge straight to the end-user, via blogs and sites such as Facebook and Twitter. That social media is very effective at improving dissemination seems well accepted, but, remarkably, there is no evidence to support this claim. We aimed to quantify the impact of social media release on views and downloads of ar...
82 CitationsSource
#1Mike Thelwall (University of Wolverhampton)H-Index: 67
#2Stefanie Haustein (UdeM: Université de Montréal)H-Index: 22
Last. Cassidy R. Sugimoto (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 31
view all 4 authors...
Altmetric measurements derived from the social web are increasingly advocated and used as early indicators of article impact and usefulness. Nevertheless, there is a lack of systematic scientific evidence that altmetrics are valid proxies of either impact or utility although a few case studies have reported medium correlations between specific altmetrics and citation rates for individual journals or fields. To fill this gap, this study compares 11 altmetrics with Web of Science citations for 76 ...
422 CitationsSource
#1Xin Shuai (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 8
#2Alberto Pepe (Harvard University)H-Index: 15
Last. Johan Bollen (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 33
view all 3 authors...
We analyze the online response to the preprint publication of a cohort of 4,606 scientific articles submitted to the preprint database arXiv.org between October 2010 and May 2011. We study three forms of responses to these preprints: downloads on the arXiv.org site, mentions on the social media site Twitter, and early citations in the scholarly record. We perform two analyses. First, we analyze the delay and time span of article downloads and Twitter mentions following submission, to understand ...
170 CitationsSource
The main purpose of the paper is to explore how research scholars of University of Delhi integrated Social Networking Sites (SNSs) into their daily communication for research work. A structured questionnaire was designed and personally distributed 160 respondents. Most used SNSs for “lurking” while few used such sites for promoting one’s research. Additionally, most respondents preferred the SNS Facebook and ResearchGate for academic purposes. Collaborative and peer-to-peer learning were common ...
52 CitationsSource
#1Xuemei Li (York University)H-Index: 9
#2Mike Thelwall (University of Wolverhampton)H-Index: 67
Last. Dean Giustini (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 16
view all 3 authors...
This paper investigates whether CiteULike and Mendeley are useful for measuring scholarly influence, using a sample of 1,613 papers published in Nature and Science in 2007. Traditional citation counts from the Web of Science (WoS) were used as benchmarks to compare with the number of users who bookmarked the articles in one of the two free online reference manager sites. Statistically significant correlations were found between the user counts and the corresponding WoS citation counts, suggestin...
183 CitationsSource
27 Citations
#1Mu-Hsuan Huang (NTU: National Taiwan University)H-Index: 22
In the era of globalization, the trend of university rankings gradually shifts from country-wide analyses to world-wide analyses. Relatively high analytical weightings on reputational surveys have led Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings to criticisms over the years. This study provides a comprehensive discussion of the indicators and weightings adopted in the QS survey. The article discusses several debates stirred in the academia on QS. Debates on this ranking system are present...
27 CitationsSource
Cited By141
Newest
#1Weiwei Yan (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 2
#2Qian Liu (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 1
Last. Shengwei Yi (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 1
view all 4 authors...
As academic social networking sites become important platforms for researchers to carry out research activities, more and more corporation researchers begin to use them. This paper explores the academic interactive behaviors of corporation users on academic social networking sites based on their social networks formed by follower–followee relationships. We take ResearchGate (RG), one of the largest popular academic social networking sites, as the research object, and obtain users’ follower–follo...
Source
#1Steven D'AlessandroH-Index: 12
#2Morgan P. MilesH-Index: 29
Last. Harold Torrez-Meruvia (EAE Business School)
view all 6 authors...
ABSTRACTThis commentary explores some of the reputational issues of using academic social networking sites (ASNS) such as ResearchGate, ResearcherID, ORCID, Academia.edu, Google Scholar, and Mendel...
Source
#1Mehwish WaheedH-Index: 6
#2Jane KlobasH-Index: 23
Last. NoorUl AinH-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Lei LiH-Index: 4
#2Chengzhi ZhangH-Index: 7
Last. Jia Tina DuH-Index: 11
view all 4 authors...
Through a two-stage survey, this paper examines how researchers judge the quality of answers on ResearchGate Q&A, an academic social networking site.,In the first-stage survey, 15 researchers from Library and Information Science (LIS) judged the quality of 157 answers to 15 questions and reported the criteria that they had used. The content of their reports was analyzed, and the results were merged with relevant criteria from the literature to form the second-stage survey questionnaire. This que...
Source
#1Jaime A. TeixeiraH-Index: 12
#2Aceil Al-Khatib (JUST: Jordan University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 7
Last. Panagiotis Tsigaris (TRU: Thompson Rivers University)H-Index: 8
view all 3 authors...
Academic research output is increasing at a very fast growth rate per year. Given this expansion, new publishers will enter the market or existing publishers will introduce new journals to capture the rapidly expanding intellectual contributions in scholarly publishing. It is thus natural that when competing factions, new and pre-existing publishers, vie to capture this expansion that inter-journal and inter-publisher competition arises. This competitive environment may induce unhealthy competit...
1 CitationsSource
#1Dennis N. Ocholla (University of Zululand)H-Index: 18
Source
#1Massimiliano Assante (Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione)H-Index: 5
#2Leonardo Candela (Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione)H-Index: 17
Last. Fabio Sinibaldi (Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione)H-Index: 3
view all 11 authors...
Abstract The open science movement is promising to revolutionise the way science is conducted with the goal to make it more fair, solid and democratic. This revolution is destined to remain just a wish if it is not supported by changes in culture and practices as well as in enabling technologies. This paper describes the D4Science offerings to enact open science-friendly Virtual Research Environments. In particular, the paper describes how complete solutions suitable for realising open science p...
Source
#1Hamed Alhoori (NIU: Northern Illinois University)H-Index: 6
#2Mohammed Samaka (Qatar University)H-Index: 11
Last. Edward A. Fox (VT: Virginia Tech)H-Index: 47
view all 4 authors...
As more scholarly content is born digital or converted to a digital format, digital libraries are becoming increasingly vital to researchers seeking to leverage scholarly big data for scientific discovery. Although scholarly products are available in abundance—especially in environments created by the advent of social networking services—little is known about international scholarly information needs, information-seeking behavior, or information use. The purpose of this paper is to address these...
3 CitationsSource
#1Xiaoguang WangH-Index: 1
#2Tao LvH-Index: 1
Last. Donald HamerlyH-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Jack Andersen (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 9
#2Stine Lomborg (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 8
AbstractWe argue that the stakes of scholarly communication are changing as a result of technology-enabled ability to self-track and the enhanced provision and proliferation of instant metrics. The...
Source