A COMPARISON OF DISCRETE CHOICE AND BEST WORST SCALING METHODS TO ASSESS AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR THE FUNDING OF NEW HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES

Published: May 22, 2013
Abstract
Background null null . Ethical, economic, political and legitimacy arguments support the consideration of public preferences in health technology decision-making. null null null null null Objective null null . (1) To assess public preferences for funding new health technologies; (2) To compare and contrast a profile case best-worst scaling (BWS) and traditional Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) methods. null null null null null null Methods null...
Paper Details
Title
A COMPARISON OF DISCRETE CHOICE AND BEST WORST SCALING METHODS TO ASSESS AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR THE FUNDING OF NEW HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES
Published Date
May 22, 2013
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.