A COMPARISON OF DISCRETE CHOICE AND BEST WORST SCALING METHODS TO ASSESS AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR THE FUNDING OF NEW HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES
Published: May 22, 2013
Abstract
Background null null . Ethical, economic, political and legitimacy arguments support the consideration of public preferences in health technology decision-making. null null null null null Objective null null . (1) To assess public preferences for funding new health technologies; (2) To compare and contrast a profile case best-worst scaling (BWS) and traditional Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) methods. null null null null null null Methods null...
Paper Details
Title
A COMPARISON OF DISCRETE CHOICE AND BEST WORST SCALING METHODS TO ASSESS AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR THE FUNDING OF NEW HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES
Published Date
May 22, 2013
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History