Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies
Abstract
Scientific findings must withstand critical review if they are to be accepted as valid, and editorial peer review (critique, effort to disprove) is an essential element of the scientific process. We review the evidence of the editorial peer-review process of original research studies submitted for paper or electronic publication in biomedical journals.To estimate the effect of processes in editorial peer review.The following databases were...
Paper Details
Title
Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies
Published Date
Apr 18, 2007
Journal
Volume
2010
Issue
1
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History