Other

Slicing & Dicing of Individual Disparate Treatment Law

Volume: 61, Issue: 3, Pages: 5
Published: Dec 31, 2001
Abstract
This article discusses the decision of the Supreme Court in Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., which may be an even more important individual disparate treatment case than the Supreme Court's 1993 decisions in Hazen Paper and St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks. After Hicks, the court had not yet seemed to set the prima facie case thresh hold high enough to permit the proven prima facie case to support a sufficiently strong inference of...
Paper Details
Title
Slicing & Dicing of Individual Disparate Treatment Law
Published Date
Dec 31, 2001
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
5
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.